ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2023
Job satisfaction of Japanese midwives in the Tokyo metropolitan area.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors influencing turnover intention among midwives: a systematic review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring and enhancing midwives' professional autonomy: Embarking on a journey of empowerment for midwives globally.European journal of midwifery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe explore job satisfaction among Japanese midwives working in different institutions within the Tokyo metropolitan area and relate this to midwives' age.
methodsThe study involved a questionnaire survey of 423 midwives working in 113 general hospitals, 70 clinics, and 58 midwifery centers in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area of Japan. The questionnaire consisted of items related to demographic and job satisfaction. Questionnaires were returned by 199 participants (47%).
resultsOf the 199 midwives, 142 worked in general hospitals (71%), 26 worked in maternity clinics (13%), and 31 worked in midwifery centers (16%). Factor analysis extracted six job satisfaction factors labelled as: F1 'midwifery services', F2 'interpersonal relations', F3 'rewarding and autonomy', F4 'working environment', F5 'working conditions', and F6 'collaboration with doctors'. Job satisfaction scores for all factors were the highest among midwives working in midwifery centers, followed by those working in maternity clinics and hospitals. Job satisfaction of F1 and F3 of those working in midwifery centers was significantly higher than those working in hospitals and maternity clinics for the younger age group, while the scores of those working in maternity clinics became higher and closer to those working in midwifery centers for other age groups.
conclusionsJob satisfaction of midwives varies by different institutions, particularly lowest for those working in hospitals than those working in midwifery clinics and centers. It is necessary to devise useful strategies for midwives in hospitals to enhance their satisfaction with midwifery services and to feel rewarded by and autonomy at work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.