Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37476350›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of extreme manufacturing2023

Porous metal implants: processing, properties, and challenges.

Amit Bandyopadhyay, Indranath Mitra, Jose D Avila, Mahadev Upadhyayula, Susmita Bose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of extreme manufacturing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Additively Manufactured SiOACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Structural design of gradient porous dental implant based on orthogonal test.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2023
    Article
  20. Fatigue behavior of additively manufactured Ti3Al2V alloy.Materials science in additive manufacturing · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amit BandyopadhyayW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Lab, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-5387
Indranath MitraW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Lab, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.
Jose D AvilaW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Lab, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.
Mahadev UpadhyayulaW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Lab, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.
Susmita BoseW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Lab, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.

Funding

Bio-tribo-corrosion resistant 3D Printed Composites for Load-bearing ImplantsR01AR078241 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI AMIT BANDYOPADHYAY · 2021 to 2026
$1.8M
3D Printed Surface Modified Porous Metal Coatings for Load-Bearing ImplantsR01AR067306 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, AMIT · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067306NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR078241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porous and functionally graded materials have seen extensive applications in modern biomedical devices-allowing for improved site-specific performance; their appreciable mechanical, corrosive, and biocompatible properties are highly sought after for lightweight and high-strength load-bearing orthopedic and dental implants. Examples of such porous materials are metals, ceramics, and polymers. Although, easy to manufacture and lightweight, porous polymers do not inherently exhibit the required mechanical strength for hard tissue repair or replacement. Alternatively, porous ceramics are brittle and do not possess the required fatigue resistance. On the other hand, porous biocompatible metals have shown tailorable strength, fatigue resistance, and toughness. Thereby, a significant interest in investigating the manufacturing challenges of porous metals has taken place in recent years. Past research has shown that once the advantages of porous metallic structures in the orthopedic implant industry have been realized, their biological and biomechanical compatibility-with the host bone-has been followed up with extensive methodical research. Various manufacturing methods for porous or functionally graded metals are discussed and compared in this review, specifically, how the manufacturing process influences microstructure, graded composition, porosity, biocompatibility, and mechanical properties. Most of the studies discussed in this review are related to porous structures for bone implant applications; however, the understanding of these investigations may also be extended to other devices beyond the biomedical field.

Indexed as

3d printingadditive manufacturingbiological propertiesload-bearing implantsmechanical propertiesporous metals

Identifiers

PMID37476350
PMCPMC10355163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.