ArticleCureus2023
Non-contrast Enhancing Group A Streptococcus Subdural Empyema: An Illustrative Case Report of a Potential Radiographic Pitfall.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subdural empyemas (SDEs) are an uncommon complication of intracranial infection, typically presenting as a hypodense collection with peripheral contrast enhancement. Herein, we report two rare cases of SDE without contrast enhancement, both secondary to group A streptococcus. The first is a 27-year-old previously healthy female, at 27 weeks of gestational age who presented with fever, headache, neurological decline, and blood cultures positive for gram-positive cocci. The second case is a previously healthy 48-year-old male who presented with left-sided otalgia, fever, headache, and precipitous decline in altered mental status and hemiplegia. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in both cases showed a subdural collection without contrast enhancement and without diffusion restriction. Despite appearances similar to subdural effusion, because of a heightened suspicion due to clinical decline, both were taken to surgery for irrigation and debridement which confirmed SDE. Both patients were treated with six weeks of intravenous antibiotics and eventually recovered without neurological deficits. SDEs are uncommon but clinically significant phenomena. These two cases demonstrate that SDEs in rare circumstances may present as non-enhancing subdural collections. Missing the diagnosis of SDE can have significant consequences to patient morbidity and mortality and as such, it not be excluded based on radiographic findings alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.