Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37476005›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

"InMotion"-Mixed physical exercise program with creative movement as an intervention for adults with schizophrenia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Hanna Poikonen, Anna Duberg, Mats Eriksson, Martin Eriksson-Crommert, Majja Lund, Margareta Möller, Mussie Msghina

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05673941 ("InMotion" - Physical Training With Creative Movement as an Intervention for Adults With Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05673941 naunknown statusnot on this map

"InMotion" - Physical Training With Creative Movement as an Intervention for Adults With Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorÖrebro University, SwedenRan2022 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsSchizophrenia and Related DisordersArmsCreative physical training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hanna PoikonenProfessorship for Learning Sciences and Higher Education, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zürich), Zürich, Switzerland.
Anna DubergUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Mats ErikssonFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Martin Eriksson-CrommertUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Majja LundFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Margareta MöllerUniversity Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Mussie MsghinaDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Schizophrenia is among the world's top 10 causes of long-term disability with symptoms that lead to major problems in social and occupational functioning, and in self-care. Therefore, it is important to investigate the efficacy of complementary treatment options for conventionally used antipsychotic medication, such as physical training, and psychosocial interventions. Objective: To combine aerobic and strength training with cognitive, emotional and social stimulation in one intervention for people with schizophrenia and test the feasibility and effects of this intervention. Methods: The study is a mixed-method randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of a 12-week intervention for adults with schizophrenia. The treatment group (30 participants) will receive the intervention in addition to standard care and the control group (30 participants) only standard care. The intervention consists of 24 biweekly sessions with a duration of 60 min. The pre-test (weeks from 4 to 2 prior to the intervention) and post-test (week 12) include clinical measure (PANSS), quality of life, social performance, movement quantity, brain function and eye tracking measures. In addition, a treatment subgroup of 12-15 participants and their family member or other next of kin will complete a qualitative interview as a part of their post-test. Two follow-up tests, including clinical, quality of life, brain function and eye tracking will be made at 6 and 12 months from the completion of the intervention to both study groups. The primary outcome is change in negative symptoms. Secondary outcome measures include general and positive symptoms, quality of life, social performance, movement quantity, brain function and eye tracking. Explorative outcome includes patient and family member or other next of kin interview. Results: Pilot data was collected by June 2023 and the main data collection will begin in September 2023. The final follow-up is anticipated to be completed by 2026. Conclusion: The InMotion study will provide new knowledge on the feasibility, efficacy, and experiences of a novel intervention for adults with schizophrenia. The hypothesis is that regular participation in the intervention will reduce clinical symptoms, normalize physiological measures such as brain activation, and contribute to new active habits for the participants. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05673941.

Indexed as

brain imagingdanceMotion Capturephysical activityphysical therapyrehabilitation medicineschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID37476005
PMCPMC10354340
OpenAlexW4383265836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.