ArticleJournal of soils and sediments2022
Soils and spoils: mineralogy and geochemistry of mining and processing wastes from lead and zinc mining at the Gratz Mine, Owen County, Kentucky.
Article in Journal of soils and sediments, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Mineralogical and geochemical features of mining and processing wastes collected in Owen County, part of the Central Kentucky Lead-Zinc district, were investigated. The Gratz mine, abandoned in the 1940s, is on a dairy farm. Aside from discerning the nature of mining refuse at the site, the investigation was part of the University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy's mission to explore unusual environments in the search for unique microbiological communities. Materials and methods: Four samples of a soil-plus-spoils mix were collected from spoil piles and two samples, the sluice and coarse samples, were closely associated with the site of the ore processing. Optical petrology (polarized reflected-light, oil-immersion optics at a final magnification of 500 ×), X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM) with selected area electron diffraction (SAED) and/or microbeam diffraction (MBD), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) analyses were employed to characterize the samples. Results and discussion: Calcite is the main mineral in most samples, followed by near equal amounts of quartz and dolomite. Sphalerite and galena are the principal sulfides and barite is the dominant sulfate. Geochemistry of major elements reflected the mineralogy, whereas trace elements showed different groupings between the minerals. Scandium, Cu, Ga, Ge, Cd, and Sb were found predominantly associated with Zn and Pb and sulfide minerals; Bi, Hf, In, Sn, and Zr with heavy mineral fraction; while the remaining trace elements, including the rare earths, were mostly distributed among other present phases, i.e., oxyhalides, oxides, silicates, and carbonaceous material. The data were used to illustrate the processes and conditions that control the sulfide-mineral oxidation and its potential for the environmental release of associated reaction products. Conclusions: The wastes represent a potential source of environmentally disruptive concentrations of Zn, Pb, and other sulfide-associated elements. The high share of carbonates suggests near-neutral conditions in deposited wastes, restricting sulfide weathering and further limiting the oxidant activity of Fe. The low-Fe content and its predominant presence in highly resistant hematite also constrain sulfide weathering. Consequently, the spoils have a low potential for generation of acidity and release of heavy metal(loid)s in the surrounding environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.