Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37475886›Full record

ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2023

The effect of restrictive fluid management on outcomes among geriatric hip fractures: a retrospective cohort study at five level I trauma centers.

Jordan Willis, Stephanie Jarvis, Gina M Berg, Chad Corrigan, Robert Madayag, Cassandra Reynolds, Allen Tanner, Gary Marshall, Carlos Palacio Lascano, David Bar-Or

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan WillisWesley Medical Center, Wichita, KS.
Stephanie JarvisInjury Outcomes Network (ION) Research, Englewood, CO.
Gina M BergWesley Medical Center, Wichita, KS.
Chad CorriganWesley Medical Center, Wichita, KS.
Robert MadayagSaint Anthony's Hospital, Lakewood, CO.
Cassandra ReynoldsSwedish Medical Center, Englewood, CO.
Allen TannerPenrose Hospital, Colorado Springs, CO.
Gary MarshallMedical City Plano, Plano, TX.
Carlos Palacio LascanoSouth Texas Health System McAllen, McAllen, TX.
David Bar-OrInjury Outcomes Network (ION) Research, Englewood, CO.
Wesley Medical Center · USBaptist Health System · USPenrose Hospital · USPlano Cancer Institute · USSaint Anthony College of Nursing · USSwedish Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restrictive fluid management (RFM) for hemodynamically unstable trauma patients has reduced mortality rates. The objective was to determine whether RFM benefits geriatric hip fracture patients, who are usually hemodynamically stable. Design: Retrospective propensity-matched study. Setting: Five Level I trauma centers (January 1, 2018-December 12, 2018). Patients: Geriatric patients (65 years or older) with hip fractures were included in this study. Patients with multiple injuries, nonoperative management, and preoperative blood products were excluded. Intervention: Patients were grouped by fluid volume (normal saline, lactated Ringer, dextrose, electrolytes, and medications) received preoperatively or ≤24 hours of arrival; patients with standard fluid management (SFM) received ≥150 mL and RFM <150 mL of fluids. Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), delayed ambulation (>2 days postoperatively), and mortality. Paired Student t-tests, Wilcoxon paired rank sum tests, and McNemar tests were used; an α value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were 523 patients (40% RFM, 60% SFM); after matching, there were 95 patients per arm. The matched patients were well-balanced, including no difference in time from arrival to surgery. RFM and SFM patients received a median of 80 mL and 1250 mL of preoperative fluids, respectively ( Conclusions: RFM seems to be safe in terms of laboratory results, complications, and disposition. SFM may lead to delayed ambulation for patients who are not walking independently before injury.

Indexed as

geriatric traumahip fracturerestrictive fluid managementresuscitation

Identifiers

PMID37475886
PMCPMC10356122
OpenAlexW4384824443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.