Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37475750›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2023

Coprophagy rapidly matures juvenile gut microbiota in a precocial bird.

Elin Videvall, Hanna M Bensch, Anel Engelbrecht, Schalk Cloete, Charlie K Cornwallis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Insects · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elin VidevallDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-3689
Hanna M BenschDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8449-9843
Anel EngelbrechtDirectorate Animal Sciences, Western Cape Department of Agriculture, Oudtshoorn, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-9541
Schalk CloeteDirectorate Animal Sciences, Western Cape Department of Agriculture, Oudtshoorn, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4548-5633
Charlie K CornwallisDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-3995
Lund University · SEStellenbosch University · ZAUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coprophagy is a behavior where animals consume feces, and has been observed across a wide range of species, including birds and mammals. The phenomenon is particularly prevalent in juveniles, but the reasons for this remain unclear. One hypothesis is that coprophagy enables offspring to acquire beneficial gut microbes that aid development. However, despite the potential importance of this behavior, studies investigating the effects in juveniles are rare. Here we experimentally test this idea by examining how ingestion of adult feces by ostrich chicks affects their gut microbiota development, growth, feeding behavior, pathogen abundance, and mortality. We conducted extensive longitudinal experiments for 8 weeks, repeated over 2 years. It involved 240 chicks, of which 128 were provided daily access to fresh fecal material from adults and 112 were simultaneously given a control treatment. Repeated measures, behavioral observations, and DNA metabarcoding of the microbial gut community, both prior to and over the course of the experiment, allowed us to evaluate multiple aspects of the behavior. The results show that coprophagy causes (a) marked shifts to the juvenile gut microbiota, including a major increase in diversity and rapid maturation of the microbial composition, (b) higher growth rates (fecal-supplemented chicks became 9.4% heavier at 8 weeks old), (c) changes to overall feeding behavior but no differences in feed intake, (d) lower abundance of a common gut pathogen (

Indexed as

bacteriotherapycoprophagiafecal microbiota transplantmicrobiome developmentoffspringostrich

Identifiers

PMID37475750
PMCPMC10355177
OpenAlexW4380373241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.