ArticleEcology and evolution2023
Nano-Strainer: A workflow for the identification of single-copy nuclear loci for plant systematic studies, using target capture kits and Oxford Nanopore long reads.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelling Complex Hybrid and Polyploid Evolutionary Relationships Using Phylogenetic Placement of Homologous Gene Copies from Target Enrichment Data.Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Nano-Strainer: A workflow for the identification of single-copy nuclear loci for plant systematic studies, using target capture kits and Oxford Nanopore long reads.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In modern plant systematics, target enrichment enables simultaneous analysis of hundreds of genes. However, when dealing with reticulate or polyploidization histories, few markers may suffice, but often are required to be single-copy, a condition that is not necessarily met with commercial capture kits. Also, large genome sizes can render target capture ineffective, so that amplicon sequencing would be preferable; however, knowledge about suitable loci is often missing. Here, we present a comprehensive workflow for the identification of putative single-copy nuclear markers in a genus of interest, by mining a small dataset from target capture using a few representative taxa. The proposed pipeline assesses sequence variability contained in the data from targeted loci and assigns reads to their respective genes, via a combined BLAST/clustering procedure. Cluster consensus sequences are then examined based on four pre-defined criteria presumably indicative for absence of paralogy. This is done by calculating four specialized indices; loci are ranked according to their performance in these indices, and top-scoring loci are considered putatively single- or low copy. The approach can be applied to any probe set. As it relies on long reads, the present contribution also provides template workflows for processing Nanopore-based target capture data. Obtained markers are further tested and then entered into amplicon sequencing. For the detection of possibly remaining paralogy in these data, which might occur in groups with rampant paralogy, we also employ the long-read assembly tool canu. In diploid representatives of the young Compositae genus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.