ArticleBrain and behavior2023
Characteristics of post-stroke dysphagia: A retrospective study based on FEES.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The crux of NPO paradox revealed by increased pneumonia incidence in post-stroke dysphagia patients with dietary restrictions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Exploring the Effects of Action Observation Therapy on Swallowing Disorders in Stroke: A Functional Connectivity-Based fMRI Study.Neural plasticity · 2025Article
- Article
- Current state of research on acupuncture for the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia: a scoping review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Characteristics of post-stroke dysphagia: A retrospective study based on FEES.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to examine the characteristics of dysphagia in stroke patients with different lesion sites and explore the factors that impact the duration of nasogastric tube after post-stroke dysphagia (PSD).
methodsPatients with PSD were screened for analysis. Stroke types and lesion sites were confirmed using MRI or CT scans. Included patients were categorized into two groups: supratentorial stroke group (including lobar and deep intracerebral stroke subgroups) and infratentorial stroke group (including brainstem and cerebellar stroke subgroups). Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), Penetration-aspiration scale (PAS), Yale pharyngeal residue (PR) severity rating scale, Functional oral intake scale (FOIS), Murray secretion severity rating scale (MSS), laryngopharyngeal sensation, and vocal fold mobility were investigated to assess the swallowing function.
resultsA total of 94 patients were included in the final analysis. Significant differences were found in PR scores (p < .001), PAS scores (p < .05), MSS scores (p < .05), and vocal fold mobility (p < .001) between infratentorial and supratentorial stroke groups. Moreover, lobar stroke showed significantly higher PR scores compared to the deep intracerebral stroke group (p < .05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated significant differences in the duration of nasogastric tube placement among the following groups: infratentorial versus supratentorial stroke, PAS ≤ 5 versus PAS > 5, PR ≥ 3 versus PR < 3, and normal vocal fold mobility versus vocal fold motion impairment group (p < .05).
conclusionsThe infratentorial stroke may lead to worse swallowing function as compared to a supratentorial stroke. Additionally, patients with infratentorial stroke, PAS > 5, PR ≥ 3, or vocal fold motion impairment may contribute to a longer duration of nasogastric tube placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.