Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474977›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2023

4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update.

Malenka M Bissell, Francesca Raimondi, Lamia Ait Ali, Bradley D Allen, Alex J Barker, Ann Bolger, Nicholas Burris, Carl-Johan Carhäll, Jeremy D Collins, Tino Ebbers and 31 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 155 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cardiac morphology and flow dynamics in children born to hypertensive pregnancies.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Malenka M BissellDepartment of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM), LIGHT Laboratories, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK. m.m.bissell@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1282-2859
Francesca RaimondiChildren's Hospital Meyer, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lamia Ait AliInstitute of Clinical Physiology CNR, Massa, Italy.
Bradley D AllenDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alex J BarkerDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, USA.
Ann BolgerDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nicholas BurrisDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Carl-Johan CarhällDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Jeremy D CollinsFoundation CNR Tuscany Region G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy.
Tino EbbersDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Christopher J FrancoisDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alex FrydrychowiczDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and Universität Zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Pankaj GargNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Julia GeigerDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hojin HaDepartment of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Anja HennemuthInstitute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael D HopeDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Albert HsiaoDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kevin JohnsonDepartments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Sebastian KozerkeInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Liliana E MaDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael MarklDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Duarte MartinsDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marci MessinaDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Thekla H OechteringDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and Universität Zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Pim van OoijDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cynthia RigsbyDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jose Rodriguez-PalomaresDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron,Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Arno A W RoestDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Willem-Alexander's Children Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center and Center for Congenital Heart Defects Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alejandro Roldán-AlzateMechanical Engineering and Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Susanne SchnellDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Julio SoteloSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Matthias StuberDépartement de Radiologie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ali B SyedDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Johannes TögerClinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Rob van der GeestDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jos WestenbergCardioVascular Imaging Group (CVIG), Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Liang ZhongNational Heart Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yumin ZhongDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Shanghai Children's Medical Center Affiliated With Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Oliver WiebenDepartments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Petter DyverfeldtDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Yittrium-90 radiation lobectomy: Dose optimization and prediction of FLR hypertrophy to enable resection of HCCR01CA233878 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI COLLINS, JEREMY DOUGLAS, LEWANDOWSKI, ROBERT J · 2019 to 2025
$3.0M
Non-invasive Evaluation of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease Using Hemodynamic BiomarkersR01HL149787 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ANSARI, SAMEER A, MARKL, MICHAEL · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
The Role of Aortic-Carotid Hemodynamics and Aberrant Flow in HIV Cerebral InjuryR21NS122511 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI RAGIN, ANN B, SCHNELL, SUSANNE · 2020 to 2021
$438k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233878NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149787NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS122511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodynamic assessment is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Four-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow imaging (4D Flow CMR) allows comprehensive and accurate assessment of flow in a single acquisition. This consensus paper is an update from the 2015 '4D Flow CMR Consensus Statement'. We elaborate on 4D Flow CMR sequence options and imaging considerations. The document aims to assist centers starting out with 4D Flow CMR of the heart and great vessels with advice on acquisition parameters, post-processing workflows and integration into clinical practice. Furthermore, we define minimum quality assurance and validation standards for clinical centers. We also address the challenges faced in quality assurance and validation in the research setting. We also include a checklist for recommended publication standards, specifically for 4D Flow CMR. Finally, we discuss the current limitations and the future of 4D Flow CMR. This updated consensus paper will further facilitate widespread adoption of 4D Flow CMR in the clinical workflow across the globe and aid consistently high-quality publication standards.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemBlood Flow VelocityHeartHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPredictive Value of Tests4D Flow CMR4D Flow MRICardiovascularClinicalFlow quantificationFlow visualizationHeart diseaseHemodynamicsMR flow imagingPhase-contrast magnetic resonance imagingRecommendations

Identifiers

PMID37474977
PMCPMC10357639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.