Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474933›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Intravenous lidocaine improves postoperative cognition in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

Xian-Xue Wang, Jing Dai, Qi Wang, Hui-Wei Deng, Yun Liu, Gui-Fan He, Hua-Jing Guo, Ya-Lan Li

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xian-Xue WangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China.
Jing DaiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, 415000, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, 415000, China.
Hui-Wei DengDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, 415000, China.
Yun LiuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, 415000, China.
Gui-Fan HeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, 415000, China.
Hua-Jing GuoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, 415000, China.
Ya-Lan LiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China. tyalan@jnu.edu.cn.
The First People's Hospital of Changde · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD) in laparoscopic surgery should not be overlooked. Intravenous lidocaine can reduce perioperative inflammatory response in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, while the effect of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery has not been well studied. We investigated whether intraoperative lidocaine improves postoperative cognitive function after laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized double blinded controlled trial to investigate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on rapid postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous lidocaine or saline. The primary outcome was cognitive dysfunction defined by a decrease from pre- to postoperative ≥ 2 of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, at the 3rd and the 7th postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were the MMSE raw score and parameters of the patients' postoperative recovery such as agitation and length of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), length of hospital stay, markers of inflammation (white blood cell count and CRP), and incidence of complications.

resultsSeventy-three patients in the lidocaine group and 77 patients in the control group completed the trial. The rate of cognitive dysfunction was lower in the lidocaine group than that in the control group, both at the 3rd (18.57% vs. 63.64% for each group respectively; RR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.19-0.32; p < 0.0001) and at the 7th postoperative day (12.33% vs. 53.25% for each group respectively; RR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.22-0.35; P < 0.001). The postoperative MMSE scores were also higher in the lidocaine group than in the control group both at the 3rd (median 25 vs. 24 respectively) and at the 7th postoperative day (26 vs. 24 respectively). Also, patients in the lidocaine group displayed a lower white blood cell count than the control group at the 1st postoperative day (8.5 ± 2.7 vs. 10.4 ± 3.3; p < 0. 001). No differences were evidenced for the other secondary outcomes.

conclusionsIntraoperative intravenous lidocaine can significantly improve postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (16/1/2022, registration number: ChiCTR2200055683).

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryLaparoscopyAnesthetics, LocalCognitionDouble-Blind MethodHumansInfusions, IntravenousLidocainePostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineLaparoscopic colorectal surgeryLidocainePostoperative cognitive dysfunctionRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID37474933
PMCPMC10360258
OpenAlexW4384922626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.