Observational studyPituitary2023
Risk of impulse control disorders in patients with Cushing's disease: do not blame cabergoline but do not give up caution.
Observational study in Pituitary, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Impulse control disorders in pituitary adenoma: What do we know and what we still don't know in almost two decades?Pituitary · 2025Article
- Article
- Advances in pharmacological treatment of CushingZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo asses risk of new-onset impulse control disorders (ICDs) in patients with Cushing's disease (CD) who initiated cabergoline (CBG) and to determine frequency of ICDs in CBG-treated patients with CD.
methodsThis naturalistic observational study had prospective and cross-sectional arms which included patients at five referral centers based in Istanbul. Patients who were scheduled for CBG were assigned to prospective arm. These patients underwent neuropsychological tests (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview, Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease-Rating Scale, Go/No-Go Task, Iowa Gambling Task, and Short Penn Continuous Performance Test) for assessment of impulsivity and psychiatric evaluations at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months of CBG treatment. Impulsivity and new-onset ICDs were prospectively assessed. Patients with CD with current CBG treatment for ≥ 3 months and matched CBG-naïve patients with CD were included in cross-sectional arm. These patients underwent the same neuropsychological and psychiatric assessments. The impulsivity and frequency of ICDs were compared between CBG-treated and CBG-naïve patients with CD.
resultsThe follow-up duration of prospective cohort (n = 14) was 7.3 ± 2.3 months. One patient developed major depressive episode and another patient developed compulsive gambling after CBG. We observed no significant changes in impulsivity scores during follow-up. In cross-sectional arm, CBG-treated (n = 34) and CBG-naïve patients (n = 34) were similar in impulsivity scores and frequency of ICDs [3 patients (8.8%) vs. 2 patients (5.9%) respectively, p = 1.0].
conclusionCBG-treated patients with CD appeared to have a low risk of ICDs, suggesting that CBG still holds promise as a safe agent in CD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.