Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474825›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Diagnostic accuracy of updated risk assessment criteria and development of novel computational prediction models for patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.

Haoxiang Zhang, Jiangping Gao, Zhen Sun, Qingkai Zhang, Bing Qi, Xingchi Jiang, Shuang Li, Dong Shang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Haoxiang Zhang *Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Jiangping Gao *Department of Surgical Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Zhen Sun *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Qingkai ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Bing QiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xingchi JiangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Shuang LiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Dong ShangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China. shangdong@dmu.edu.cn.
First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CNGansu Provincial Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are risks of choledocholithiasis in symptomatic gallstones, and some surgeons have proposed the identification of choledocholithiasis before cholecystectomy. Our goal was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the latest guidelines and create computational prediction models for the accurate prediction of choledocholithiasis.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed symptomatic gallstone patients hospitalized with suspected choledocholithiasis. The diagnostic performance of 2019 and 2010 guidelines of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and 2019 guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) in different risks. Lastly, we developed novel prediction models based on the preoperative predictors.

resultsA total of 1199 patients were identified and 681 (56.8%) had concurrent choledocholithiasis and were included in the analysis. The specificity of the 2019 ASGE, 2010 ASGE, and 2019 ESGE high-risk criteria was 85.91%, 72.2%, and 88.42%, respectively, and their positive predictive values were 85.5%, 77.4%, and 87.3%, respectively. For Mid-risk patients who followed 2019 ASGE about 61.8% of them did not have CBD stones in our study. On the choice of surgical procedure, laparoscopic cholecystectomy + laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration can be considered the optimal treatment choice for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis instead of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP). We build seven machine learning models and an AI diagnosis prediction model (ModelArts). The area under the receiver operating curve of the machine learning models was from 0.77 to 0.81. ModelArts AI model showed predictive accuracy of 0.97, recall of 0.97, precision of 0.971, and F1 score of 0.97, surpassing any other available methods.

conclusionThe 2019 ASGE guideline and 2019 ESGE guideline have demonstrated higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk criteria compared to the 2010 ASGE guideline. The excellent diagnostic performance of the new artificial intelligence prediction model may make it a better choice than traditional guidelines for managing patients with suspected choledocholithiasis in future.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholedocholithiasisGallstonesArtificial IntelligenceCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentArtificial intelligenceMachine learningSuspected choledocholithiasisThe American Society for Gastrointestinal EndoscopyThe European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID37474825
OpenAlexW4384923458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.