ArticleWorld journal of urology2023
Clinical and time-related predictors of sepsis in patients with obstructive uropathy due to ureteral stones in the emergency setting.
Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for the clinical outcome of patients with ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC urology · 2026Pooled it
- Foley catheter after ureteroscopy and JJ stent placement: a randomised prospective European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis-Young Academic Urologists (EULIS-YAU) endourology study.BJU international · 2025Trial
- A novel scoring system developed to predict emergency department re-attendance in patients with ureteral stones: The REVISIT-STONE score.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- The optimal management of large upper ureteral stones (> 1.5 cm) with infection in elderly patients: a comparative analysis of three minimally invasive surgical approaches.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of combined rigid and flexible ureteroscopy for complex ureteral stones in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Machine learning constructs a diagnostic prediction model for calculous pyonephrosis.Urolithiasis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWell-defined clinical predictors of sepsis after upper tract drainage for obstructive uropathy due to ureteral stones are needed. We aim to determine whether sepsis after decompression of the upper urinary tract may be predicted by clinical and time-related factors, specifically delay time from symptom onset to hospital presentation (StH) and from hospital presentation to surgical decompression (HtD).
methodsIn this single-center retrospective study, data from 196 consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department for obstructive uropathy due to ureteral stones and submitted to surgical decompression were evaluated. Postoperative sepsis was defined as an acute increase in ≥ 2 SOFA points and documented blood or urine cultures.
resultsMedian StH and HtD were 24 (6-48) and 17 (10-30) hours, respectively. Thirty-three (16.8%) patients developed sepsis. Septic patients were more frequently female (75.8% vs. 37.4%, p < 0.001), had higher preoperative max body temperature (p < 0.001), white blood cells (WBC) count (p < 0.01), C-reactive protein (CRP) values (p < 0.001) and larger stone diameter (7.2 vs. 6 mm, p = 0.02). StH and HtD did not differ according to sepsis status. Time for WBC normalization and CRP halving were longer for septic patients (all p < 0.02). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, max body temperature ≥ 38 °C (OR 21.5; p < 0.001), female gender (OR 3.6; p = 0.02) and higher CRP (OR 1.1; p < 0.001) were independently associated with sepsis status.
conclusionClinical and laboratory parameters are associated with an increased risk of sepsis after decompression. StH and HtD timing are not associated with higher sepsis rates. In selected patients, urinary decompression could be delayed or primary ureteroscopy could be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.