Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474691›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2023

Timing of Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Processing in Human Intracranial EEG.

Sofiia Moraresku, Jiri Hammer, Radek Janca, Petr Jezdik, Adam Kalina, Petr Marusic, Kamil Vlcek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sofiia MorareskuLaboratory of Neurophysiology of Memory, Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 142 20, Prague, Czechia. sofiia.moraresku@fgu.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0003-2378-9377
Jiri HammerDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-8458-1273
Radek JancaDepartment of Circuit Theory, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0003-0825-1069
Petr JezdikDepartment of Circuit Theory, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0001-8932-0497
Adam KalinaDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-7316-364X
Petr MarusicDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-1240-653X
Kamil VlcekLaboratory of Neurophysiology of Memory, Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 142 20, Prague, Czechia. kamil.vlcek@fgu.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-3093
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Technical University in Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial reference frames (RFs) play a key role in spatial cognition, especially in perception, spatial memory, and navigation. There are two main types of RFs: egocentric (self-centered) and allocentric (object-centered). Although many fMRI studies examined the neural correlates of egocentric and allocentric RFs, they could not sample the fast temporal dynamics of the underlying cognitive processes. Therefore, the interaction and timing between these two RFs remain unclear. Taking advantage of the high temporal resolution of intracranial EEG (iEEG), we aimed to determine the timing of egocentric and allocentric information processing and describe the brain areas involved. We recorded iEEG and analyzed broad gamma activity (50-150 Hz) in 37 epilepsy patients performing a spatial judgment task in a three-dimensional circular virtual arena. We found overlapping activation for egocentric and allocentric RFs in many brain regions, with several additional egocentric- and allocentric-selective areas. In contrast to the egocentric responses, the allocentric responses peaked later than the control ones in frontal regions with overlapping selectivity. Also, across several egocentric or allocentric selective areas, the egocentric selectivity appeared earlier than the allocentric one. We identified the maximum number of egocentric-selective channels in the medial occipito-temporal region and allocentric-selective channels around the intraparietal sulcus in the parietal cortex. Our findings favor the hypothesis that egocentric spatial coding is a more primary process, and allocentric representations may be derived from egocentric ones. They also broaden the dominant view of the dorsal and ventral streams supporting egocentric and allocentric space coding, respectively.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionSpatial ProcessingElectrocorticographyHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingAllocentricEgocentricHigh-frequency gamma activityIntracranial EEGReference framesSpatial judgment

Identifiers

PMID37474691
PMCPMC10522529
OpenAlexW4384922933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.