Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474686›Full record

SynthesisSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024

Effects of different Chinese traditional exercises on sleep quality and mental health of adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jin Dong, Desheng Wang, Hang Li, HengBo Ni

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jin Dong *Physical Education Institute, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China. Tydongjin@163.com.
Desheng Wang *Physical Education Institute, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China.
Hang LiInformation School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
HengBo NiPhysical Education Institute, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of traditional Chinese exercises on sleep quality and mental health in adults with different health statuses.

methodThis review was registered a priori (CRD42023382188) and executed according to PRISMA statement guidelines. We searched the databases CNKI, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), Wangfang, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from the date of database creation to March 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, evaluated the methodological quality of the included literature, and then used Revman 5.4 and Stata 17.0 for the corresponding statistical analysis and graphing.

resultsThirty-four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, with a total sample of 2563 adults (1276 in the experimental group and 1287 in the control group). The meta-analysis results showed that traditional Chinese exercise significantly improved sleep quality in different groups [WMD =  - 1.58, 95% CI =  - 2.17, - 1.00, P < 0.00001] and that Badaanjin was better than Taijiquan in improving sleep quality. For mental health, traditional Chinese exercise had good effects on anxiety [WMD =  - 1.66, 95% CI =  - 2.64, - 0.69, P = 0.0009] and depression [WMD =  - 1.67, 95% CI =  - 3.23, - 0.11, P = 0.04].

conclusionTraditional Chinese exercises can improve the quality of sleep and mental health in different groups of people and are highly recommended for good health effects.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyMental HealthSleep QualityAdultHumansMedicine, Chinese TraditionalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBaDuanJinMental healthSleep qualityTaiChi

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.