In one paragraphArticle in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Xun Hui YeoGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Genome, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2787-5320 Vignesh SundararajanCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117599, Republic of Singapore.
Zhengwei WuGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Genome, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9229-6176 Zi Jin Cheryl PhuaGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Genome, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.
Yin Ying HoBioprocessing Technology Institute (BTI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 20 Biopolis Way, Centros, Singapore, 138668, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5154-9605 Kai Lay Esther PehBioprocessing Technology Institute (BTI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 20 Biopolis Way, Centros, Singapore, 138668, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5622-8870 Yi-Chia ChiuGraduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ying Swan HoBioprocessing Technology Institute (BTI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 20 Biopolis Way, Centros, Singapore, 138668, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-3106 David Shao Peng TanCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117599, Republic of Singapore.
Wai Leong TamGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Genome, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-5264 Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNational University of Singapore · SGNational Taiwan University · TW
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
PMID37474650
PMCPMC10359334
OpenAlexW4384926551
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390