Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474583›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

Citizens' Perceptions of Research and Innovation Dilemmas: Insights from a Large-Scale Survey in Four European Regions.

Katharina Fellnhofer, Margarita Angelidou, Thomas Bakratsas, Chiara Buongiovanni, Toni Eiser, Elena Hörndler, Anastasia Panori, Rene Wintjes, Gabriella Quaranta

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katharina FellnhoferSwiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. kfellnhofer@ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-8421-1547
Margarita AngelidouQ-Plan International Advisors P.C., Thessaloniki, Greece.
Thomas BakratsasWhite Research SRL, Saint-Gilles, Belgium.
Chiara BuongiovanniAPRE - Agenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Italiana, Rome, Italy.
Toni EiserResearch and Innovation Management GmbH, Neumarkt an der Ybbs, Austria.
Elena HörndlerResearch and Innovation Management GmbH, Neumarkt an der Ybbs, Austria.
Anastasia PanoriAristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Rene WintjesUniversity of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Gabriella QuarantaEMSO - European Multidisciplinary Seafloor and Water Column Observatory, Rome, Italy.

Funding

European Commission (EC) 872526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a valuable dataset supporting regional research and innovation systems in four European regions: Vestland (Norway), Kriti (Greece), Galicia (Spain), and Overijssel (Netherlands). It focuses on understanding citizens' perceptions of research and innovation dilemmas within these regions. The dataset comprises 14 questions aligned with the Responsible Research and Innovation framework, evaluating stakeholders' techno-moral attitudes towards technological change and socio-economic outcomes. A survey conducted between April and July 2020 gathered responses from 7,729 individuals, ensuring broad age and gender representation. This dataset is highly valuable for regional policymaking and policymakers' engagement strategies, enhancing equity and effectiveness in addressing grand societal challenges. Research outcomes reveal citizens' aspirations for developmental trajectories prioritizing quality-of-life, renewable energy, and support for innovative SMEs in their regions. The study contributes to existing research by highlighting limited citizen trust and expectations of effective government actions in addressing societal challenges at the regional level.

Identifiers

PMID37474583
PMCPMC10359344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.