ArticleScientific reports2023
Comparing surgical outcomes of da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi for endometrial cancer surgical staging in a propensity score-matched study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reduced-port robotic surgery versus multiport robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Emerging robotic platforms in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative outcomes of da Vinci SP versus da Vinci Xi platforms in robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative operative performance of three robotic platforms in benign gynecologic surgery: a single-surgeon retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Feasibility and perioperative safety of robotic liver resection using the da Vinci SP system: early single-center case series.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Clinical application and early experience of da Vinci Xi robotic single-site laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in mainland China: early experience from a retrospective consecutive cohort of 221 cases.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy for deep endometriosis using the da Vinci SP versus Xi systems.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer using Robot da VinciAnnals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Application and research progress of single-port laparoscopy in retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Adverse events and device malfunctions in da Vinci robotic surgery: an analysis of MAUDE data from the recent decade.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Single-port robotic surgery in gynecology: first experience in German-speaking countries using the Da Vinci SP system in benign andneoplastic diseases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluating the learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy: single-port versus multi-port Da Vinci platforms.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic Single-Port Versus Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Early Endometrial Cancer: A Case Control Study.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025Article
- Da VinciAnnals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Advantages of robotic single-port hysterectomy compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy on clinical and aesthetic outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Comparing approaches to benign hysterectomy using conventional multi-port and newer single-port robots: a propensity score matching analysis of surgical outcomes and literature review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Initial clinical experiences of robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Da Vinci™ SP system: a single-center retrospective study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted surgery in benign gynecology: single-center experience with 106 patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Surgical Outcomes of da Vinci Xi™ and da Vinci SP™ for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Initial Outcomes and Methodologies of a Novel Single-Port Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of studies comparing robotic systems in endometrial cancer staging is limited. This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 42 consecutive endometrial cancer patients, who underwent robotic staging using the da Vinci SP (SP) system, and 126 propensity score-matched patients who underwent staging using the da Vinci Xi (Xi) system. Median console and total operation times were longer in the SP group than those in the Xi group (125 vs. 77 min, p < 0.001; 225 vs. 154.5 min, p < 0.001, respectively). Notably, the median console time of the first 10 cases using SP was 184 min; it subsequently decreased to 99.5 min in the fourth 10 cases. SP had lesser postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) change (0.6 ± 0.7 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.9 g/dL in Xi, p < 0.001) and lower median pain score at 6 h after surgery (2 vs. 3 in Xi, p = 0.046). Moreover, median postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the SP group (2 days) than that in the Xi group (6 days) (p < 0.001). Although SP was correlated with lower postoperative Hb change, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower pain score than those in Xi, it required longer operation times. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to validate the benefits of SP compared to other robotic platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.