ArticleScientific reports2023
The prognostic ability of radiotherapy of different colorectal cancer histological subtypes and tumor sites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cucurbitacin D Induces Apoptotic Cell Death via NOX4 and Overcomes Radioresistance in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- 3d electron cloud descriptors for enhanced QSAR modeling of anti-colorectal cancer compounds.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- Cytoskeleton imaging of colorectal and lung cancer spheroids using light sheet microscopy.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Laryngeal mucinous adenocarcinoma in a 45-year-old woman: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Change in Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Rectal Cancer Between 2010 and 2022.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic significance of radiotherapy (RT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) has shown conflicting results, particularly among different pathological subtypes, including adenocarcinoma (AC), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC), and signet-ring cell carcinoma (SR). This study analyzed the prognosis of three pathological CRC types and focused on the prognostic significance of RT on three CRC histological subtypes. Patients diagnosed with AC (n = 54,174), MC (n = 3813), and SR (n = 664) in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2017) were evaluated. Cox regression models and competitive risk models were built to assess the effect of RT on the risk of CRC-associated death. Potential interactions between RT and stratified variables including age, sex, and tumor location were examined by multiplicative models. Compared with AC patients, SR patients had the worst overall survival (OS) among 3 subtypes of CRC (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Compared with patients who did not receive radiotherapy, RT was associated with a 1.09-fold (HR = 1.09, 95%[CI]: 1.03, 1.15) elevated risk of death among AC patients. In the SR group, RT significantly reduced the risk of death by 39% (HR = 0.61, 95%[CI]: 0.39-0.95). However, RT did not appear to independently influence survival in the MC group (HR = 0.96, 95%[CI]: 0.77, 1.21). In the subgroup analysis, tumor location (colon and rectum) significantly modified the association between RT and the risk of death among the AC and SR patients (p for interaction < 0.05). SR patients exhibited a worse OS (overall survival) than AC patients, and the effect of RT varied according to CRC histological subtypes. This can ultimately lead to more personalized and effective treatment strategies for CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.