Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474499›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

The copy number and mutational landscape of recurrent ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.

Philip Smith, Thomas Bradley, Lena Morrill Gavarró, Teodora Goranova, Darren P Ennis, Hasan B Mirza, Dilrini De Silva, Anna M Piskorz, Carolin M Sauer, Sarwah Al-Khalidi and 13 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip Smith *CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9306-1747
Thomas Bradley *CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0218-5021
Lena Morrill GavarróCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2242-4010
Teodora GoranovaCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Darren P EnnisOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Hasan B MirzaOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6460-5290
Dilrini De SilvaCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anna M PiskorzCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Carolin M SauerCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2168-6630
Sarwah Al-KhalidiCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ionut-Gabriel FuninganaCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1197-2652
Marika A V ReiniusCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-3317
Gaia GiannoneOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Liz-Anne LewsleyCRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jamie StoboCRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
John McQueenCRUK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Gareth BrysonDepartment of Histopathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Matthew EldridgeCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5799-8911
BriTROC Investigators
Geoff MacintyreCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3906-467X
Florian MarkowetzCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2784-5308
James D BrentonCRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. james.brenton@cruk.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5738-6683
Iain A McNeishOvarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. i.mcneish@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-7586
University of Cambridge · GBOvarian Cancer Action · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBAt Bristol · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25355Cancer Research UK A15601Cancer Research UK A18072Cancer Research UK A19274Cancer Research UK A22905Cancer Research UK A26204Cancer Research UK DRCQQR-JUN22\100005Department of Health P77646Wellcome Trust RG92770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The drivers of recurrence and resistance in ovarian high grade serous carcinoma remain unclear. We investigate the acquisition of resistance by collecting tumour biopsies from a cohort of 276 women with relapsed ovarian high grade serous carcinoma in the BriTROC-1 study. Panel sequencing shows close concordance between diagnosis and relapse, with only four discordant cases. There is also very strong concordance in copy number between diagnosis and relapse, with no significant difference in purity, ploidy or focal somatic copy number alterations, even when stratified by platinum sensitivity or prior chemotherapy lines. Copy number signatures are strongly correlated with immune cell infiltration, whilst diagnosis samples from patients with primary platinum resistance have increased rates of CCNE1 and KRAS amplification and copy number signature 1 exposure. Our data show that the ovarian high grade serous carcinoma genome is remarkably stable between diagnosis and relapse and acquired chemotherapy resistance does not select for common copy number drivers.

Indexed as

Cystadenocarcinoma, SerousOvarian NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID37474499
PMCPMC10359414
OpenAlexW4384924762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.