Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474342›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology2023

Long-term prognostic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach after radical resection: A national multicenter study.

Ze-Ning Huang, Ying-Qi Huang, Qing-Qi Hong, Peng Zhang, Zi-Zhen Zhang, Liang He, Liang Shang, Lin-Jun Wang, Ya-Feng Sun, Zhi-Xiong Li and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Ze-Ning HuangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Ying-Qi HuangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Qing-Qi HongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, Xiamen Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zi-Zhen ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Liang HeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Liang ShangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Lin-Jun WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ya-Feng SunDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Zhi-Xiong LiGastrointestinal Surgery Unit 1, Teaching Hospital of Putian First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Putian, China.
Jun-Jie LiuGastrointestinal Department of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Fang-Hui DingGeneral Surgery Department, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
En-De LinDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated with Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yong-An FuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Quanzhou First Hospital to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Shuang-Ming LinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated with Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China.
Jun LuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Chao-Hui ZhengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Chang-Ming HuangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. Electronic address: pingli811002@163.com.
Fujian Medical University · CNUnion Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University · CNFirst Hospital of Jilin University · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNLanzhou University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNPutian University · CNRenji Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University · CNShandong First Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNZhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus on whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is effective for hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between AC and the long-term prognosis of patients with HAS.

methodsThe clinicopathological data of 239 patients with primary HAS who underwent radical surgery from April 1, 2004 to December 31, 2019 in 14 centers in China were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the AC group (127 patients) and the nonadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group (112 patients).

resultsKaplan‒Meier (KM) analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the 1-year3-year overall survival rate (OS) and 1-year, 3-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) between the AC group and the NAC group (1-year OS: 85.6% vs. 79.8%, 3-year OS: 59.8% vs. 62.4%, 1-year RFS: 69.8% vs. 74.4%, 3-year RFS: 57.2% vs. 55.9%, all P > 0.05). The subpopulation treatment effect pattern plots (STEPP) did not show treatment heterogeneity of AC in patients with HAS. The proportions of local recurrence and metastasis sites in the two groups were similar. Although the smoothed hazard curves of the NAC and AC groups crossed, the peak hazard time was later in the AC group (5.9 and 4.7 months), and the peak hazard rate was lower (0.032 and 0.038, P = 0.987).

conclusionThe current AC regimen may not significantly improve the survival of patients with HAS after radical surgery.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAdjuvant chemotherapyBenefitHepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomachPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID37474342
OpenAlexW4384432153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.