Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474170›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Lessons learnt from the first wave of COVID-19 in Damascus, Syria: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Ibrahem Hanafi, Lyana Alzamel, Ola Alnabelsi, Sondos Sallam, Samaher Almousa

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ibrahem HanafiDivision of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic ibrahem.w.hanafi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5306-0128
Lyana Alzamel *Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Ola Alnabelsi *Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Sondos SallamDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Damascus Hospital, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.
Samaher AlmousaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tishreen Military Hospital, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe decade-long Syrian war led to fragile health infrastructures lacking in personal and physical resources. The public health of the Syrian population was, therefore, vulnerable to the COVID-19 pandemic, which devastated even well-resourced healthcare systems. Nevertheless, the officially reported incidence and fatality rates were significantly lower than the forecasted numbers.

designA retrospective cohort study.

settingThe four main responding hospitals in Damascus, which received most of the cases during the first pandemic wave in Syria (i.e., June-August 2020).

participantsOne thousand one hundred eighty-four patients who were managed as inpatient COVID-19 cases. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The records of hospitalised patients were screened for clinical history, vital signs, diagnosis modality, major interventions and status at discharge.

resultsThe diagnostic and therapeutic preparedness for COVID-19 was significantly heterogeneous among the different centres and depleted rapidly after the arrival of the first wave. Only 32% of the patients were diagnosed based on positive reverse transcription-PCR tests. Five hundred twenty-six patients had an indication for intensive care unit admission, but only 82% of them received it. Two hundred fifty-seven patients needed mechanical ventilation, but ventilators were not available to 14% of them, all of whom died. Overall mortality during hospitalisation reached 46% and no significant difference was found in fatality between those who received and did not receive these care options.

conclusionsThe Syrian healthcare system expressed minor resilience in facing the COVID-19 pandemic, as its assets vanished swiftly with a limited number of cases. This forced physicians to reserve resources (e.g., ventilators) for the most severe cases, which led to poor outcomes of in-hospital management and limited the admission capacity for milder cases. The overwhelmed system additionally suffered from constrained coordination, suboptimal allocation of the accessible resources and a severe inability to informatively report on the catastrophic pandemic course in Syria.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SyriaCOVID-19international health servicesorganisational developmentpublic health

Identifiers

PMID37474170
PMCPMC10360434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.