Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474168›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Process modelling of NHS cardiovascular waiting lists in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Salvador Catsis, Alan R Champneys, Rebecca Hoyle, Christine Currie, Jessica Enright, Katherine Cheema, Mike Woodall, Gianni Angelini, Ramesh Nadarajah, Chris Gale and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Salvador CatsisDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Alan R ChampneysDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rebecca HoyleDepartment of Mathematics, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1645-1071
Christine CurrieDepartment of Mathematics, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jessica EnrightDepartment of Mathematics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Katherine CheemaBritish Heart Foundation, London, UK.
Mike WoodallNHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK.
Gianni AngeliniCardiac Surgery, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1753-3730
Ramesh NadarajahLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9895-9356
Chris GaleLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Ben GibbisonCardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ben.gibbison@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3635-6212
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo model the referral, diagnostic and treatment pathway for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the English National Health Service (NHS) to provide commissioners and managers with a methodology to optimise patient flow and reduce waiting lists. STUDY

designA systems dynamics approach modelling the CVD healthcare system in England. The model is designed to capture current and predict future states of waiting lists.

settingRoutinely collected, publicly available data streams of primary and secondary care, sourced from NHS Digital, NHS England, the Office of National Statistics and StatsWales. DATA COLLECTION AND EXTRACTION

methodsThe data used to train and validate the model were routinely collected and publicly available data. It was extracted and implemented in the model using the PySD package in python.

resultsNHS cardiovascular waiting lists in England have increased by over 40% compared with pre- COVID-19 levels. The rise in waiting lists was primarily due to restrictions in referrals from primary care, creating a bottleneck postpandemic. Predictive models show increasing point capacities within the system may paradoxically worsen downstream flow. While there is no simple rate-limiting step, the intervention that would most improve patient flow would be to increase consultant outpatient appointments.

conclusionsThe increase in NHS CVD waiting lists in England can be captured using a systems dynamics approach, as can the future state of waiting lists in the presence of further shocks/interventions. It is important for those planning services to use such a systems-oriented approach because the feed-forward and feedback nature of patient flow through referral, diagnostics and treatment leads to counterintuitive effects of interventions designed to reduce waiting lists.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCOVID-19HumansPandemicsState MedicineWaiting ListsCardiac surgeryCARDIOLOGYHealth policy

Identifiers

PMID37474168
PMCPMC10357301
OpenAlexW4384924448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.