ArticleBMJ open2023
Process modelling of NHS cardiovascular waiting lists in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct access CT coronary angiography in patients referred with suspected cardiac chest pain: a novel patient pathway.Open heart · 2026Article
- Developing core indicators for identifying people at risk of delayed heart failure diagnosis.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Implementing system dynamics in hospital services to improve operational efficiency: An empirical research study.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Optimising cardiac surgery outcomes in people with diabetes: the OCTOPuS pilot feasibility study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Article
- Exercise professionals in extended scope of practice roles: a qualitative exploration of a new model of rehabilitation.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Across the Health Care Pathway: A National, Multicenter, Patient-Informed Investigation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo model the referral, diagnostic and treatment pathway for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the English National Health Service (NHS) to provide commissioners and managers with a methodology to optimise patient flow and reduce waiting lists. STUDY
designA systems dynamics approach modelling the CVD healthcare system in England. The model is designed to capture current and predict future states of waiting lists.
settingRoutinely collected, publicly available data streams of primary and secondary care, sourced from NHS Digital, NHS England, the Office of National Statistics and StatsWales. DATA COLLECTION AND EXTRACTION
methodsThe data used to train and validate the model were routinely collected and publicly available data. It was extracted and implemented in the model using the PySD package in python.
resultsNHS cardiovascular waiting lists in England have increased by over 40% compared with pre- COVID-19 levels. The rise in waiting lists was primarily due to restrictions in referrals from primary care, creating a bottleneck postpandemic. Predictive models show increasing point capacities within the system may paradoxically worsen downstream flow. While there is no simple rate-limiting step, the intervention that would most improve patient flow would be to increase consultant outpatient appointments.
conclusionsThe increase in NHS CVD waiting lists in England can be captured using a systems dynamics approach, as can the future state of waiting lists in the presence of further shocks/interventions. It is important for those planning services to use such a systems-oriented approach because the feed-forward and feedback nature of patient flow through referral, diagnostics and treatment leads to counterintuitive effects of interventions designed to reduce waiting lists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.