Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37471455›Full record

SynthesisPLoS computational biology2023

Gene signature discovery and systematic validation across diverse clinical cohorts for TB prognosis and response to treatment.

Roger Vargas, Liam Abbott, Daniel Bower, Nicole Frahm, Mike Shaffer, Wen-Han Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomarker tests of progression from tuberculosis infection to disease: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roger VargasBill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Liam AbbottBill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Daniel BowerBill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nicole FrahmBill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mike ShafferBill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Wen-Han YuBill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-9744
Gates Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While blood gene signatures have shown promise in tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis and treatment monitoring, most signatures derived from a single cohort may be insufficient to capture TB heterogeneity in populations and individuals. Here we report a new generalized approach combining a network-based meta-analysis with machine-learning modeling to leverage the power of heterogeneity among studies. The transcriptome datasets from 57 studies (37 TB and 20 viral infections) across demographics and TB disease states were used for gene signature discovery and model training and validation. The network-based meta-analysis identified a common 45-gene signature specific to active TB disease across studies. Two optimized random forest regression models, using the full or partial 45-gene signature, were then established to model the continuum from Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection to disease and treatment response. In model validation, using pooled multi-cohort datasets to mimic the real-world setting, the model provides robust predictive performance for incipient to active TB risk over a 2.5-year period with an AUROC of 0.85, 74.2% sensitivity, and 78.3% specificity, which approximates the minimum criteria (>75% sensitivity and >75% specificity) within the WHO target product profile for prediction of progression to TB. Moreover, the model strongly discriminates active TB from viral infection (AUROC 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.94). For treatment monitoring, the TB scores generated by the model statistically correlate with treatment responses over time and were predictive, even before treatment initiation, of standard treatment clinical outcomes. We demonstrate an end-to-end gene signature model development scheme that considers heterogeneity for TB risk estimation and treatment monitoring.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisDisease ProgressionHumansTranscriptomeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37471455
PMCPMC10393163
OpenAlexW4384925944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.