ArticlePloS one2023
Harnessing the power of AI: Advanced deep learning models optimization for accurate SARS-CoV-2 forecasting.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing epidemic intelligence: evaluating Senegal's mpox surveillance system and readiness for AI-driven predictive modelling.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Retraction: Harnessing the power of AI: Advanced deep learning models optimization for accurate SARS-CoV-2 forecasting.PloS one · 2025Article
- Retraction: Deep learning in public health: Comparative predictive models for COVID-19 case forecasting.PloS one · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: Multi-modal deep learning methods for classification of chest diseases using different medical imaging and cough sounds.PloS one · 2024Article
- Correction: Harnessing the power of AI: Advanced deep learning models optimization for accurate SARS-CoV-2 forecasting.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Correction · 2023-12-14Error in Text · Updated to Retraction ·
- Retraction · 2025-04-09Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Duplication of Data · Duplication of/in Image · Euphemisms for Duplication · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) ·
- Erratum issued
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pandemic has significantly affected many countries including the USA, UK, Asia, the Middle East and Africa region, and many other countries. Similarly, it has substantially affected Malaysia, making it crucial to develop efficient and precise forecasting tools for guiding public health policies and approaches. Our study is based on advanced deep-learning models to predict the SARS-CoV-2 cases. We evaluate the performance of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bi-directional LSTM, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), CNN-LSTM, Multilayer Perceptron, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN). We trained these models and assessed them using a detailed dataset of confirmed cases, demographic data, and pertinent socio-economic factors. Our research aims to determine the most reliable and accurate model for forecasting SARS-CoV-2 cases in the region. We were able to test and optimize deep learning models to predict cases, with each model displaying diverse levels of accuracy and precision. A comprehensive evaluation of the models' performance discloses the most appropriate architecture for Malaysia's specific situation. This study supports ongoing efforts to combat the pandemic by offering valuable insights into the application of sophisticated deep-learning models for precise and timely SARS-CoV-2 case predictions. The findings hold considerable implications for public health decision-making, empowering authorities to create targeted and data-driven interventions to limit the virus's spread and minimize its effects on Malaysia's population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.