Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37471395›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2023

Induction of labour at 39 weeks and adverse outcomes in low-risk pregnancies according to ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and parity: A national cohort study in England.

Patrick Muller, Amar M Karia, Kirstin Webster, Fran Carroll, George Dunn, Alissa Frémeaux, Tina Harris, Hannah Knight, Sam Oddie, Asma Khalil and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to Address Disparities in Perinatal Outcomes by Ethnicity: A Systematic Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antenatal Care Bundle for Preventing Stillbirths: Proposed Intervention by Stillbirth Society of India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick MullerDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Amar M KariaClinical Quality, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8197-168X
Kirstin WebsterClinical Quality, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8204-3802
Fran CarrollClinical Quality, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7124-7719
George DunnClinical Quality, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.
Alissa FrémeauxClinical Quality, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0626-5646
Tina HarrisClinical Quality, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7026-5798
Hannah KnightThe Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Sam OddieClinical Quality, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8701-4912
Asma KhalilClinical Quality, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.
Jan Van Der MeulenDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9451-2335
Ipek Gurol-UrganciDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6517-3485
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists · GBHealth Foundation · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthnic and socioeconomic inequalities in obstetric outcomes are well established. However, the role of induction of labour (IOL) to reduce these inequalities is controversial, in part due to insufficient evidence. This national cohort study aimed to identify adverse perinatal outcomes associated with IOL with birth at 39 weeks of gestation ("IOL group") compared to expectant management ("expectant management group") according to maternal characteristics in women with low-risk pregnancies. METHODS AND

findingsAll English National Health Service (NHS) hospital births between January 2018 and March 2021 were examined. Using the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) dataset, maternal and neonatal data (demographic, diagnoses, procedures, labour, and birth details) were linked, with neonatal mortality data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Women with a low-risk pregnancy were identified by excluding pregnancies with preexisting comorbidities, previous cesarean section, breech presentation, placenta previa, gestational diabetes, or a baby with congenital abnormalities. Women with premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, amniotic fluid abnormalities, or antepartum stillbirth were excluded only from the IOL group. Adverse perinatal outcome was defined as stillbirth, neonatal death, or neonatal morbidity, the latter identified using the English composite neonatal outcome indicator (E-NAOI). Binomial regression models estimated risk differences (with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) between the IOL group and the expectant management group, adjusting for ethnicity, socioeconomic background, maternal age, parity, year of birth, and birthweight centile. Interaction tests examined risk differences according to ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and parity. Of the 1 567 004 women with singleton pregnancies, 501 072 women with low-risk pregnancies and with sufficient data quality were included in the analysis. Approximately 3.3% of births in the IOL group (1 555/47 352) and 3.6% in the expectant management group (16 525/453 720) had an adverse perinatal outcome. After adjustment, a lower risk of adverse perinatal outcomes was found in the IOL group (risk difference -0.28%; 95% CI -0.43%, -0.12%; p = 0.001). This risk difference varied according to socioeconomic background from 0.38% (-0.08%, 0.83%) in the least deprived to -0.48% (-0.76%, -0.20%) in the most deprived national quintile (p-value for interaction = 0.01) and by parity with risk difference of -0.54% (-0.80%, -0.27%) in nulliparous women and -0.15% (-0.35%, 0.04%) in multiparous women (p-value for interaction = 0.02). There was no statistically significant evidence that risk differences varied according to ethnicity (p = 0.19). Key limitations included absence of additional confounding factors such as smoking, BMI, and the indication for induction in the HES datasets, which may mean some higher risk pregnancies were included.

conclusionsIOL with birth at 39 weeks was associated with a small reduction in the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, with 360 inductions in low-risk pregnancies needed to avoid 1 adverse outcome. The risk reduction was mainly present in women from more socioeconomically deprived areas and in nulliparous women. There was no significant risk difference found by ethnicity. Increased uptake of IOL at 39 weeks, especially in women from more socioeconomically deprived areas, may help reduce inequalities in adverse perinatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionStillbirthCohort StudiesEnglandEthnicityFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, InducedParityPlacentaPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID37471395
PMCPMC10358943
OpenAlexW4384923966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.