Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37471339›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Insights and protocols for discrimination of sugarcane clones by dissimilarity measures on RGB and NIR data.

Luiz Alexandre Peternelli, Andréa Carla Bastos Andrade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luiz Alexandre PeternelliDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7683-0583
Andréa Carla Bastos AndradeDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0111-1792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In sugarcane breeding, dense experiments have been considered in the initial phase (T1), such as the Simplified System (SS) of genotype selection. In this method, the seedlings of each family are transplanted directly from the seed box to the field, forming a kind of carpet. Despite the practical aspect of the method, selection problems are common, as stalks from the same individual within the family are subject to being taken to later evaluation stages, to the detriment of stalks from different individuals. To facilitate the discrimination of stalks of the same family in SS, we evaluated using RGB images (red:green:blue) and NIR (near infrared) spectra. We applied Euclidean distance (D) and Mahalanobis distance (D2) dissimilarity measures to the image and spectral data to distinguish stalks with different genotypes. RGB and NIR data were taken from type +1 leaf samples collected from two experimental blocks, totaling 31 evaluated families. The analyzes were carried out in two stages. In the first stage, we sought to evaluate the classification capacity using RGB images and NIR spectra, using D as a measure of dissimilarity. In the second step, we developed and validated a protocol using RGB images to classify clones, with D2 as a dissimilarity measure. Preliminary results, with distance D, allowed to discriminate clones based on the distance of the evaluated attributes and their combinations. In addition, with the analyzes using the D distance, it was identified that only the use of the R attribute (red band) would give satisfactory results for the second stage, which was the proposed analysis protocol, applying the D2 distance. The D2 statistic and associated p-value confirmed the protocol's usefulness in discriminating stalks in SS, especially stalks from the same families.

Indexed as

SaccharumGenotypeHumansPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID37471339
PMCPMC10359001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.