Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37471316›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Validation of a parent proxy-reported beverage screener compared to a 24-hour dietary recall for the measurement of sugar-containing beverage intake among young children.

Isobel Sharpe, Sharon I Kirkpatrick, Brendan T Smith, Charles D G Keown-Stoneman, Jessica A Omand, Shelley Vanderhout, Christine Warren, Jonathon L Maguire, Catherine S Birken, Laura N Anderson and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isobel SharpeDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6468-4438
Sharon I KirkpatrickSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Brendan T SmithDepartment of Health Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2785-1246
Charles D G Keown-StonemanApplied Health Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8790-1589
Jessica A OmandDivision of Child Health Evaluative Sciences (CHES), Sick Kids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shelley VanderhoutApplied Health Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christine WarrenDepartment of Health Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathon L MaguireApplied Health Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine S BirkenDivision of Child Health Evaluative Sciences (CHES), Sick Kids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura N AndersonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6106-5073
TARGet Kids! collaboration

Funding

CIHR SA2-152806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measures that can provide reasonably accurate estimates of sugar-containing beverage (SCB) intake among children are needed. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the relative validity of a short beverage screener (Nutrition and Health Questionnaire, NHQ) compared to a 24-hour recall (Automated Self-Administered 24-h (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool-Canada) for assessing parent proxy-reported daily SCB intake among children aged 4-14 years from the TARGet Kids! research network in Toronto, Canada. Children for whom a NHQ completed between March 2018 and June 2019 and an ASA24 completed within one year were included. A total of 471 parents who completed the NHQ beverage screener were also asked to complete the ASA24. One-hundred sixty-three completed the ASA24 and of this group, 109 were analyzed. Estimates of daily intake of 100% juices, sweetened drinks and soda, and total SCBs from the two measures were compared. The mean difference in beverage intake, Spearman correlations, and Bland-Altman plots were estimated for continuous measures. The kappa coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for dichotomous measures of any daily intake versus none. The mean difference in total SCB intake between the NHQ and ASA24 was 0.14 cups/day (95% CI 0.01, 0.29) and the correlation was 0.43 (95% CI 0.26, 0.57). Sensitivity and specificity for any daily SCB intake were 0.63 and 0.76, respectively. Overall, parent proxy-reporting of children's total SCB intake from a beverage screener can provide reasonable estimates of SCB intake when detailed dietary assessment is not feasible.

Indexed as

BeveragesDietChildChild, PreschoolHumansMental RecallParentsReproducibility of ResultsSugarsSurveys and QuestionnairesSugars

Identifiers

PMID37471316
PMCPMC10358879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.