ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
Ten simple rules for scientists engaging in science communication.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary prevention of Parkinson's disease: proceedings, the 8C's and a position statement from the Parkinson's disease prevention think tank.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- Bakteriopolis: Introducing Microbes to Society.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
- The value of learned societies in the biological sciences: benefits, threats, and futures.BMC biology · 2026Review
- Article
- How can academic researchers more effectively contribute to environmental toxicology and health efforts for regulatory decisions, policymakers, nonprofits, and communities?Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2026Review
- Stop the spread: Empowering students to address misinformation through community-engaged, interdisciplinary science communication training.Journal of research in science teaching · 2025Article
- Psychophysiological correlates of science communicators.PloS one · 2025Article
- VueGen: automating the generation of scientific reports.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Ten simple rules for successfully carrying out funded research projects.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for successfully managing EU research grants.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Communicating Nutritional Knowledge to the Chinese Public: Examining Predictive Factors of User Engagement on TikTok in China.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Creative Communication Partnership to Promote Curricula Dissemination on Social Media.Journal of STEM outreach · 2024Article
- Examination of public perceptions of microbes and microbiomes in the United States reveals insights for science communication.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.