ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2023
Comb Detection for Measuring Shear Wave Propagation.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shear wave elastography primer for the abdominal radiologist.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Estimation of the phase velocity dispersion curves for viscoelastic materials using Point Limited Shear Wave Elastography.Ultrasonics · 2025Article
- Acoustic radiation force-induced longitudinal shear wave for ultrasound-based viscoelastic evaluation.Ultrasonics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plane wave compounding (PWC) is widely used to measure the propagation of shear waves. Implementing PWC on most commercial ultrasound scanners is challenging because all channel (>128) data must be processed or transferred to the host computing unit in real time. Comb detection transmits multiple focused beams simultaneously and results in a reduced number of receive lines to be processed in parallel. These comb beams are scanned laterally to acquire receive lines at different lateral positions in order to obtain data over a large region of interest (ROI). One of the potential issues with using multiple simultaneously transmitted beams is the issue of crosstalk between the beams. Crosstalk is analyzed through simulated beam patterns, simulated B-mode images, and motion data from shear wave elastography (SWE) experiments. Using a Hamming window on transmit and receive can suppress crosstalk to 1.2% root-mean-square error (RMSE, normalized RMSE to the peak magnitude of the reference signal) for shear wave motion signals. Four comb beams with three laterally scanned locations cover almost the entire field of view (FOV) and achieve the same frame rate as PWC with three angles. Phantom and in vivo studies demonstrate comparable motion data of comb detection to PWC in terms of motion signal quality and measured phase velocity. In addition, comb detection provides motion with lower noise and stronger signals than PWC, which is believed to be due to the advantages of transmitting focused beams rather than plane waves (PWs).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.