Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37471127›Full record

SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2023

Parents' Perceptions of Children's and Adolescents' Use of Electronic Devices to Promote Physical Activity: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.

María Eugenia Visier-Alfonso, Mairena Sánchez-López, Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín, Abel Ruiz-Hermosa, Raquel Bartolomé-Gutiérrez, Irene Sequí-Domínguez, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María Eugenia Visier-AlfonsoFaculty of Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0364-8032
Mairena Sánchez-LópezSchool of Education, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0217-0623
Beatriz Rodríguez-MartínFaculty of Occupational Therapy, Logopedia and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Talavera de la Reina, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3939-0299
Abel Ruiz-HermosaDepartment of Didactics of Musical, Plastic and Body Expression, Faculty of Sports and Sciences, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5127-0591
Raquel Bartolomé-GutiérrezDepartment of Psychology, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2013-9053
Irene Sequí-DomínguezHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8981-4331
Vicente Martínez-VizcaínoFaculty of Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6121-7893
University of Castilla-La Mancha · ESUniversidad de Extremadura · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of physical activity (PA) electronic devices offers a unique opportunity to engage children and adolescents in PA. For this age group (2-17 years), parents play a key role in promoting healthy lifestyles and regulating the use of electronic devices. Therefore, parents' perceptions of the use of electronic devices for PA in children and adolescents are critical for efficient intervention.

objectiveThe aim of this qualitative systematic review was to improve the understanding of parents' perceptions of the use of electronic devices for PA in children and adolescents.

methodsA systematic search of electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Scopus, OpenGrey, and Deep Blue) was conducted. Studies from inception (2010) to May 2022 were identified. Qualitative studies on the perceptions of healthy children's and adolescents' (aged 2-17 years) parents regarding PA interventions performed on electronic devices were included according to the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group Guidance Series and the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. The Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument was used for methodological validity.

resultsIn total, 18 studies with 410 parents, mostly mothers, were included. Parents' perceptions were grouped into 4 categories: usefulness, advantages, general perceptions (electronic devices for health promotion, preferences for real-life PA, and concerns), and acceptability (barriers and facilitators) of electronic devices for PA. Parents perceived electronic devices as useful for increasing PA, learning new skills, and increasing motivation for PA and valued those devices that promoted socialization and family and peer bonding. In terms of general perceptions, parents had positive attitudes toward PA electronic devices; however, they preferred outdoor and real-life PA, especially for preschoolers and children. Concerns, such as physical and psychological harm, addiction, conflicts, and compliance difficulties, were found. Facilitators were identified as ease of use, appropriate feedback, promotion of socialization, and motivational strategies, such as rewards, challenges, and attractiveness. Barriers, such as discomfort, price, and difficulties in using or understanding electronic devices, were also identified. For older children and adolescents, parents were more concerned about high levels of screen time and setting limits on electronic devices and therefore preferred PA electronic devices rather than traditional ones.

conclusionsOverall, the participants had positive attitudes toward electronic devices for PA and perceived them as an effective way to promote PA in children and adolescents. They also perceived several benefits of using electronic devices, such as health promotion, increased awareness and motivation, and socialization, as well as barriers, facilitators, and age differences. The results of this study could provide researchers with insights into designing more effective, age-appropriate PA electronic devices for children and adolescents and improving adherence to their use.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42021292340; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=292340.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionParentsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLearningMotivationadolescentschildreneHealthelectronic devicesparents’ perceptionsphysical activityqualitativesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37471127
PMCPMC10401398
OpenAlexW4380082018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.