Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37470953›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

How to fit transfer models to learning data: a segmentation/clustering approach.

Giulia Mezzadri, Thomas Laloë, Fabien Mathy, Patricia Reynaud-Bouret

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giulia MezzadriCognition and Decision Lab, Columbia University, New York, US. gm3026@columbia.edu.
Thomas LaloëLaboratoire J.A. Dieudonné UMR CNRS 7351, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Fabien MathyLaboratoire Bases, Corpus, Langage UMR CNRS 7320, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Patricia Reynaud-BouretLaboratoire J.A. Dieudonné UMR CNRS 7351, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Funding

3IA Côte d'Azur Investissements d'Avenir ANR-19-P3IA-0002ChaMaNe project ANR-19-CE40-0024-02UCAJedi ANR-15-IDEX-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although transfer models are limited in their ability to evolve over time and account for a wide range of processes, they have repeatedly shown to be useful for testing categorization theories and predicting participants' generalization performance. In this study, we propose a statistical framework that allows transfer models to be applied to category learning data. Our framework uses a segmentation/clustering technique specifically tailored to suit category learning data. We applied this technique to a well-known transfer model, the Generalized Context Model, in three novel experiments that manipulated ordinal effects in category learning. The difference in performance across the three contexts, as well as the benefit of the rule-based order observed in two out of three experiments, were mostly detected by the segmentation/clustering method. Furthermore, the analysis of the segmentation/clustering outputs using the backward learning curve revealed that participants' performance suddenly improved, suggesting the detection of an "eureka" moment. Our adjusted segmentation/clustering framework allows transfer models to fit learning data while capturing relevant patterns.

Indexed as

Generalization, PsychologicalLearningCluster AnalysisHumansCategorizationCategory transfer modelsGeneralized Context Model (GCM)Rule-based versus similarity-based presentation orderSegmentation/Clustering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.