Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37470943›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2023

Prognosis difference between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chengxin Li, Qianqian Yuan, Tong Deng, Gaoran Xu, Jinxuan Hou, Lewei Zheng, Gaosong Wu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chengxin Li *Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qianqian Yuan *Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Tong DengDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Gaoran XuDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Jinxuan HouDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Lewei ZhengDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Gaosong WuDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. wugaosongtj@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9296-7080
Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHER2-low breast cancer (BC) is proposed to be a special population of patients with an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1 + or 2 + and non-amplified in situ hybridization (ISH) results. The role and prognostic impact of HER2-low BC is still controversial. This meta-analysis aims to explore the prognostic difference between of HER2-low and HER2-zero characteristic in BC patients.

methodsA meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and eligible studies were search in PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE databases. Quality assessment of included studies were performed by Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Furthermore, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and analysis for publication bias were conducted.

resultsEighteen studies comprising a total of 93,317 patients were included for meta-analysis. BC patients with HER2-low characteristic have longer OS (HRs 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.93, p < 0.0001) and DFS (HRs 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.93, p = 0.001) compared to those with HER2-zero characteristic. Subgroup analysis indicate that the source of heterogeneity may come from the hormone receptor (HR) status group. Although, the publication bias was detected, sensitivity analysis and the trim-and-fill method analysis demonstrated the stability and reliability of the results.

conclusionHER2-low BC patients have longer OS and DFS compared to HER2-zero BC patients, and its prognostic value is consistent among different HR status patients. Whether HER2-low breast cancer is an independent subtype of breast cancer is still a subject of ongoing research, and more studies are needed to fully understand the molecular and clinical features of this subtype.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReproducibility of ResultsHER2-low breast cancerMeta-analysisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID37470943
OpenAlexW4384820457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.