ArticleMolecular diversity2024
Probing the origins of programmed death ligand-1 inhibition by implementing machine learning-assisted sequential virtual screening techniques.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PD-L1 is a key immunotarget involved in binding to its receptor PD-1. PD-L1/PD-1 interface blocking using antibodies (or small molecules) is the central area of interest for tumor suppression in various cancers. Blocking the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway in the tumor cells results in its immune activation and destruction, and thereby restoring the T-cell proliferation and cytokine production. The active binding site interface residues of PD-L1/PD-1 were experimentally known and proven by structural biology and site-directed mutagenesis studies. Structure-based molecular design technique was employed to identify the inhibitors for blocking the PD-L1/PD-1 interface. Nine hits to leads were identified from the SPECS small molecule database by machine learning, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation techniques. Following this, a machine learning-assisted QSAR modeling approach was implemented using ChEMBL database to gain insights into the inhibitory potential of PD-L1 inhibitors and predict the activity of our previously screened nine hit molecules. The best leads identified in the present study bind strongly with the active sites of PD-L1/PD-1 interface residues, which include A121, M115, I116, S117, I54, Y56, D122, and Y123. These computational leads are considered promising molecules for further in vitro and in vivo analysis to be developed as potential PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors to cure different types of cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.