Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37470899›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2023

Investigating Factors Influencing Prenatal Stress, Anxiety, and Fear of Childbirth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany and Switzerland: An Online Survey.

Rita T Amiel Castro, Nora K Schaal, Hannah Meyerhoff, Heidi Preis, Brittain Mahaffey, Marci Lobel, Pearl La Marca-Ghaemmaghami

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rita T Amiel Castro *Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-8770
Nora K Schaal *Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Dusseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2458-2661
Hannah MeyerhoffDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Heidi PreisDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-290X
Brittain MahaffeyDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0134-9584
Marci LobelDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-2422
Pearl La Marca-GhaemmaghamiPsychology Counselling and Research Institute for Sexuality, Marriage and the Family, International Academy for Human Sciences and Culture, Staadweg 3, P.O. Box 57, 8880, Walenstadt, Switzerland. pearl.lamarca@peace-academy-society.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5494-9228
Stony Brook School · USUniversity of Zurich · CHHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEInternational Peace Institute · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPregnant women are likely to experience high levels of stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the factors that might influence the extent of experienced emotional distress are poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to investigate potential correlates of prenatal emotional distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsIn total, N = 1437 pregnant women from Germany and Switzerland participated in an online study during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (May-August 2020). The survey assessed prenatal distress, pandemic-related pregnancy stress, general anxiety, fear of childbirth, and several socio-demographic, pregnancy- and COVID-19-related factors. Linear multivariate regression models were the main analytical strategy.

resultsThe results highlight that several factors such as full-time employment, nulliparity, high-risk pregnancy, emotional problems, cancelled prenatal appointments, and stating that COVID-19 affected the choice of birth mode were significantly associated with elevated prenatal distress, anxiety, pandemic-related pregnancy stress, and fear of childbirth. Conversely, access to an outdoor space was a protective factor for pandemic-related pregnancy stress and prenatal distress. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Overall, the study highlights significant correlates influencing the levels of emotional distress pregnant women experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings may contribute to the improvement of maternal prenatal medical and psychological care during a public health crisis of international concern, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyDepressionFearFemaleHumansPandemicsParityPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSwitzerlandAnxietyCOVID-19 pandemicDepressionFear of childbirthPandemic-related pregnancy stressPregnancyStress

Identifiers

PMID37470899
OpenAlexW4384819502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.