ReviewHNO2023
[Revision surgery after stapedectomy].
Review in HNO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Revision stapes surgery is considered to be significantly more demanding than primary stapes surgery, both in terms of the indication and the surgical approach. This article reviews common indications for revision after stapedectomy as well as the surgical approaches and intraoperative findings. A distinction is made between revision surgeries, which are usually carried out because of conductive hearing loss a long time after stapes surgery, and acute or subacute revisions that become necessary in the immediate postoperative course. With the shortening of postoperative observation times under inpatient conditions as a result of increasing economization and the associated shift of the immediate postoperative phase to the outpatient setting, the recognition of postoperative irregularities is also becoming increasingly important for otorhinolaryngologists in private practice, even if they do not perform these highly specialized interventions themselves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.