ArticleACS applied bio materials2023
Electrostatic Acoustic Sensor with an Impedance-Matched Diaphragm Characterized for Body Sound Monitoring.
Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Fixed-Frequency to Tunable: Advances in Acoustic Sensors for Physiological Acoustic Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diaphragm Design for an Electret Microphone Stethoscope.IEEE sensors journal · 2025Article
- Acoustic impedance-based surface acoustic wave chip for gas leak detection and respiratory monitoring.Communications engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acoustic sensors are able to capture more incident energy if their acoustic impedance closely matches the acoustic impedance of the medium being probed, such as skin or wood. Controlling the acoustic impedance of polymers can be achieved by selecting materials with appropriate densities and stiffnesses as well as adding ceramic nanoparticles. This study follows a statistical methodology to examine the impact of polymer type and nanoparticle addition on the fabrication of acoustic sensors with desired acoustic impedances in the range of 1-2.2 MRayls. The proposed method using a design of experiments approach measures sensors with diaphragms of varying impedances when excited with acoustic vibrations traveling through wood, gelatin, and plastic. The sensor diaphragm is subsequently optimized for body sound monitoring, and the sensor's improved body sound coherence and airborne noise rejection are evaluated on an acoustic phantom in simulated noise environments and compared to electronic stethoscopes with onboard noise cancellation. The impedance-matched sensor demonstrates high sensitivity to body sounds, low sensitivity to airborne sound, a frequency response comparable to two state-of-the-art electronic stethoscopes, and the ability to capture lung and heart sounds from a real subject. Due to its small size, use of flexible materials, and rejection of airborne noise, the sensor provides an improved solution for wearable body sound monitoring, as well as sensing from other mediums with acoustic impedances in the range of 1-2.2 MRayls, such as water and wood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.