Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37470665›Full record

SynthesisSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association

Association between smoking and colorectal cancer in Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohammad-Hossein Keivanlou, Ehsan Amini-Salehi, Soheil Hassanipour, Abinash Mahapatro, Nakka Raghuma, Farahnaz Joukar, Negin Letafatkar, Arman Habibi, Naeim Norouzi, Maryam Sadat Aleali and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammad-Hossein KeivanlouGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Ehsan Amini-SalehiGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Soheil HassanipourGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Abinash MahapatroSchool of Medicine, Hi-Tech Medical College and Hospital, Rourkela, Odisha, India.
Nakka RaghumaSchool of Medicine, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajamahendravaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Farahnaz JoukarGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Negin LetafatkarGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Arman HabibiGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Naeim NorouziGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Maryam Sadat AlealiGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Mona JavidGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Arian MirdamadiGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Fariborz Mansour-GhanaeiGastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Guilan University of Medical Sciences · IRCreative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Smoking poses a significant risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), considered the third leading reason for cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, there has been limited research on the relationship between smoking and CRC in the Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO). Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to combine available data and gain a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between smoking and CRC in EMRO. Methods: Two independent researchers searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until December 2022. The included studies were checked for risk of bias administering the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics and the Cochrane test. Publication bias was determined through funnel plot analysis and Egger's regression test. Additionally, a meta-regression analysis explored the impact of a country's Human Development Index (HDI) on the relationship between smoking and CRC. Results: The final analysis included 26 studies, revealing a significant association between smoking and CRC (OR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.11 - 1.78; P = 0.004). Moreover, smoking had a more pronounced adverse effect on CRC in countries with higher HDIs compared to those with lower HDIs (OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.99 - 1.71; P = 0.054). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the importance of implementing smoking cessation programs and policies in EMRO countries, as they demonstrate a positive relationship between smoking and the risk of CRC. Furthermore, the results suggest that a country's level of human development may influence the association between smoking and CRC. Further research is needed to investigate this potential connection and develop targeted public health interventions.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsSmokingHumansColorectal cancerCRC/EMROmeta-analysisrisk factorsmokingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37470665
PMCPMC10445494
OpenAlexW4383103243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.