Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37470522›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia

Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in cardiac surgeries- A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abhijit Nair, Praveen Saxena, Nitin Borkar, Manamohan Rangaiah, Nishant Arora, Prasanta Kumar Mohanty

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06254430 (Effects of Erector Spina Plan Block and Epidural Analgesia in Whipple Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06254430 completednot on this map

Effects of Erector Spina Plan Block and Epidural Analgesia in Whipple Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2023 to 2023Enrolled65ConditionsPancreatic Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Year in Review 2023: Noteworthy Literature in Cardiac Anesthesiology.Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Fascial plane blocks for cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Abhijit NairDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ibra Hospital, Ministry of Health-Oman, Ibra-414, Sultanate of Oma.
Praveen SaxenaDepartment of Cardiac Anesthesia, National Heart Center, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
Nitin BorkarDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Manamohan RangaiahDepartment of Anaesthetics and Pain Management, Walsall Manor Hospital, Moat Rd, Walsall WS2 9PS, United Kingdom.
Nishant AroraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Kings College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Prasanta Kumar MohantyDepartment of Cardiac Anesthesia, National Heart Center, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
Ministry of Health · OMManor Hospital · GBRoyal Hospital · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been used in many studies for providing opioid-sparing analgesia after various cardiac surgeries. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of ESPB in cardiac surgeries. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar to identify the studies in which ESPB was compared with the control group/sham block in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries. The primary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative opioid consumption, ventilation time, time to the first mobilization, length of ICU and hospital stay, and adverse events. Out of 607 studies identified, 16 studies (n = 1110 patients) fulfilled inclusion criteria and were used for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Although, 24-hr opioid consumption were comparable in both groups group (MD, -18.74; 95% CI, -46.85 to 9.36, P = 0.16), the 48-hr opioid consumption was significantly less in ESPB group than control ((MD, -11.01; 95% CI, -19.98 to --2.04, P = 0.02). The pain scores at various time intervals and intraoperative opioid consumption were significantly less in ESPB group. Moreover, duration of ventilation, time to the first mobilization, and length of ICU and hospital were also less in ESPB group (P < 0.00001, P < 0.00001, P < 0.00001, and P < 0.0001, respectively). This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that ESPB provides opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia, facilitates early extubation and mobilization, leads to early discharge from ICU and hospital, and has lesser pruritus when compared to control in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaNerve BlockAirway ExtubationAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidAnalgesiacardiac surgerycoronary artery bypass graftingerector spinae plane blockpostoperativeregional anesthesiavalve replacement

Identifiers

PMID37470522
PMCPMC10451138
OpenAlexW4383749953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.