ArticleHuman brain mapping2023
Single-subject electroencephalography measurement of interhemispheric transfer time for the in-vivo estimation of axonal morphology.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-subject electroencephalography measurement of interhemispheric transfer time for the in-vivo estimation of axonal morphology.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing axonal morphology in vivo opens new avenues for the combined study of brain structure and function. A novel approach has recently been introduced to estimate the morphology of axonal fibers from the combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and electroencephalography (EEG) measures of the interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT). In the original study, the IHTT measures were computed from EEG data averaged across a group, leading to bias of the axonal morphology estimates. Here, we seek to estimate axonal morphology from individual measures of IHTT, obtained from EEG data acquired in a visual evoked potential experiment. Subject-specific IHTTs are computed in a data-driven framework with minimal a priori constraints, based on the maximal peak of neural responses to visual stimuli within periods of statistically significant evoked activity in the inverse solution space. The subject-specific IHTT estimates ranged from 8 to 29 ms except for one participant and the between-session variability was comparable to between-subject variability. The mean radius of the axonal radius distribution, computed from the IHTT estimates and the MRI data, ranged from 0 to 1.09 μm across subjects. The change in axonal g-ratio with axonal radius ranged from 0.62 to 0.81 μm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.