Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37470401›Full record

SynthesisArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2024

Is Neurodevelopmental Assessment in Early Childhood Predictive of Performance Assessed Later in Childhood and Adolescence in Sub-Saharan Africa? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Roméo Zoumenou, Florence Bodeau-Livinec, Léa Chausseboeuf, Michael J Boivin, Jaqueline Wendland

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Early gross motor development: Agreement between the AIMS and the BSID-III.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roméo ZoumenouInstitut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Mère et enfant face aux infections tropicales, 75006 Paris, France.
Florence Bodeau-LivinecInstitut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail (IRSET), Ecole des hautes etudes en santé (EHESP), 93210 Saint-Denis, France.
Léa ChausseboeufLaboratoire psychopathologie et processus en santé, Institute de psychologie, 92774 Boulogne, France.
Michael J BoivinDepartment of Psychiatry and Department of Neurology & Ophthalmology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0097-1777
Jaqueline WendlandLaboratoire psychopathologie et processus en santé, Institute de psychologie, 92774 Boulogne, France.
Université Paris Cité · FRÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FRUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Fondation de France 00100075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost neurodevelopmental tests used to assess child development in sub-Saharan Africa were developed in western or high-income countries, raising the question of their usefulness with African children.

objectiveThis systematic review identified and synthesized key findings from studies measuring development in children in Sub-Saharan Africa in early childhood and again at school age, to assess neurocognitive associations longitudinally from infancy through middle childhood.

methodsThe study was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method, selecting articles referenced in the PubMed, PsycInfo, and Embase databases using the following inclusion criteria: published between 2000 and 2022, written in French or English, and presenting results dealing with the objective assessment of child's neurodevelopment. All articles were registered in the Zotero reference manager and analyzed by title, abstract, and full text.

resultsSeveral of the seven selected studies confirmed that attention and working memory in infancy can predict children's neurocognitive performance, including mathematical ability, at school age. In two of the studies, children with poor mental development at 1 year of age are more likely to present with poorer behavioral development at school age, including learning difficulties in school and risk for grade repetition.

conclusionCognitive ability assessed in early childhood is strongly associated with performance at school age in cohorts of African children followed longitudinally. Even with assessments adapted cross-culturally, infants and preschoolers at risk for poor developmental outcomes can be identified to better receive strategic early interventions to enhance their development.

Indexed as

CognitionSchoolsAdolescentAfrica South of the SaharaChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolHumansInfantNeuropsychological TestsAfricaAssessmentChildrenCognitive abilityDevelopmentReview

Identifiers

PMID37470401
PMCPMC10802230
OpenAlexW4384817030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.