Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37470063›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2023

European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT)-TLJ 3.0 Consensus on Histopathological Analysis of Pre-Implantation Donor Kidney Biopsy: Redefining the Role in the Process of Graft Assessment.

Gianluigi Zaza, David Cucchiari, Jan Ulrich Becker, Aiko P J de Vries, Albino Eccher, Sandrine Florquin, Jesper Kers, Marion Rabant, Michele Rossini, Liset Pengel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Gianluigi ZazaNephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University/Hospital of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
David CucchiariDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Jan Ulrich BeckerInstitut für Pathologie und Molekularpathologie, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Aiko P J de VriesDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Albino EccherDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Sandrine FlorquinDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jesper KersDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marion RabantDepartment of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, Paris, France.
Michele RossiniNephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, University/Hospital of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Liset PengelCentre for Evidence in Transplantation, Oxford, United Kindom.
Lorna MarsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Lucrezia FurianKidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
University of Amsterdam · NLHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESInstitut für Hämatopathologie Hamburg · DEInstitut Necker Enfants Malades · FRLeiden University Medical Center · NLOxford Centre for Mission Studies · GBUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ESOT TLJ 3.0. consensus conference brought together leading experts in transplantation to develop evidence-based guidance on the standardization and clinical utility of pre-implantation kidney biopsy in the assessment of grafts from Expanded Criteria Donors (ECD). Seven themes were selected and underwent in-depth analysis after formulation of PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison, outcomes) questions. After literature search, the statements for each key question were produced, rated according the GRADE approach [Quality of evidence: High (A), Moderate (B), Low (C); Strength of Recommendation: Strong (1), Weak (2)]. The statements were subsequently presented in-person at the Prague kick-off meeting, discussed and voted. After two rounds of discussion and voting, all 7 statements reached an overall agreement of 100% on the following issues: needle core/wedge/punch technique representatively [B,1], frozen/paraffin embedded section reliability [B,2], experienced/non-experienced on-call renal pathologist reproducibility/accuracy of the histological report [A,1], glomerulosclerosis/other parameters reproducibility [C,2], digital pathology/light microscopy in the measurement of histological variables [A,1], special stainings/Haematoxylin and Eosin alone comparison [A,1], glomerulosclerosis reliability

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationOrgan TransplantationBiopsyGraft SurvivalHumansKidneyReproducibility of ResultsTissue Donorsconsensus paperexpanded criteria donorshistopathologykidney transplantationpre-implantation kidney biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37470063
PMCPMC10353313
OpenAlexW4383069948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.