ReviewCureus2023
The Use of Empagliflozin Post Myocardial Infarction.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early in-hospital use of SGLT2i in heart failure patients with ischemic etiology.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Observational
- Efficacy of Empagliflozin Versus Placebo in Patients With Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Empagliflozin demonstrates neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects by reducing ischemia/reperfusion damage in rat models of ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that is mainly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study's objective was to assess empagliflozin's effects and impacts on post-myocardial patients to highlight its worth in comparison to alternative therapies. Only studies evaluating the effects of empagliflozin on individuals who have undergone a myocardial infarction (MI) are included in this review of the literature, which employed PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. To compare the advantages of empagliflozin for individuals who have recently experienced a myocardial infarction, abstracts from pertinent articles were retrieved, and complete publications were reviewed. A total of four articles were reviewed, which showed that in patients who suffered from a recent MI, empagliflozin caused a significant decrease in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Additionally, it was shown that these individuals had better echocardiographic results for both structural and functional metrics. With studies showing a significantly larger median NT-proBNP decrease with empagliflozin compared to placebo among patients hospitalised with an acute big MI when empagliflozin was started early and administered in addition to the post-MI care suggested by guidelines, it is safe to say that the benefits outweigh the risks. There are currently larger double-blind trials in progress to prove the hypothesis of the benefits of empagliflozin for post-MI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.