Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37469735›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2023

Revitalizing case reports: Standardized guidelines and mentorship.

Madhan Jeyaraman, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Naveen Jeyaraman, Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Shilpa Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Madhan JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai 600056, Tamil Nadu, India. madhanjeyaraman@gmail.com.
Swaminathan RamasubramanianDepartment of General Medicine, Government Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai 600018, Tamil Nadu, India.
Naveen JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Chengalpet 603108, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arulkumar NallakumarasamyDepartment of Orthopaedics, All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar 751019, Odisha, India.
Shilpa SharmaDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a decrease in publication, case reports remain essential in medical literature as they offer detailed descriptions of individual patient cases and valuable insights for future management. These reports adhere to a standardized structure comprising sections such as abstract, introduction, case report, discussion, and conclusion. Obtaining informed consent and adhering to guidelines is essential. Case reports contribute to evidence-based medicine by detecting new therapies and adverse events. They also facilitate clear reporting, guideline adherence, and mentorship programs. These reports are vital for documenting rare occurrences, assisting clinicians in timely management, and communicating novel information to busy medical professionals. Following case report guidelines ensures comprehensive and standardized reporting, enhancing the acceptance and quality of case reports, and advancing medical knowledge.

Indexed as

Case reportCase report guidelinesLiteratureResearch

Identifiers

PMID37469735
PMCPMC10353498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.