Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37469721›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2023

Fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with metabolic syndrome and obesity: A randomized controlled trial.

Alberto Machado da Ponte Neto, Aniele Cristine Ott Clemente, Paula Waki Rosa, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Mateus Pereira Funari, Gabriel Cairo Nunes, Luana Moreira, Luiz Gustavo Sparvoli, Ramon Cortez, Carla Romano Taddei and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto Machado da Ponte NetoDepartament of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Aniele Cristine Ott ClementeDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Paula Waki RosaDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Igor Braga RibeiroDepartament of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil. igorbraga1@gmail.com.
Mateus Pereira FunariDepartament of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Gabriel Cairo NunesDepartament of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Luana MoreiraDepartment of Clinical and Toxicology Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Luiz Gustavo SparvoliDepartment of Clinical and Toxicology Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Ramon CortezDepartment of Clinical and Toxicology Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Carla Romano TaddeiDepartment of Clinical and Toxicology Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Márcio C ManciniDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de MouraDepartament of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, São Paulo 05403-010, SP, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetabolic syndrome is a multifactorial disease, and the gut microbiota may play a role in its pathogenesis. Obesity, especially abdominal obesity, is associated with insulin resistance, often increasing the risk of type two diabetes mellitus, vascular endothelial dysfunction, an abnormal lipid profile, hypertension, and vascular inflammation, all of which promote the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

aimTo evaluate the outcomes of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with metabolic syndrome.

methodsThis was a randomized, single-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing FMT and a sham procedure in patients with metabolic syndrome. We selected 32 female patients, who were divided into eight groups of four patients each. All of the patients were submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In each group, two patients were randomly allocated to undergo FMT, and the other two patients received saline infusion. The patients were followed for one year after the procedures, during which time anthropometric, bioimpedance, and biochemical data were collected. The patients also had periodic consultations with a nutritionist and an endocrinologist. The primary end point was a change in the gut microbiota.

resultsThere was evidence of a postprocedural change in microbiota composition in the patients who underwent FMT in relation to that observed in those who underwent the sham procedure. However, we found no difference between the two groups in terms of the clinical parameters evaluated.

conclusionThere were no significant differences in biochemical or anthropometric parameters, between the two groups evaluated. Nevertheless, there were significant postprocedural differences in the microbiota composition between the placebo group. To date, clinical outcomes related to FMT remain uncertain.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusEndocrinologyEndoscopyFecal microbiota transplantationMetabolic syndromeObesity

Identifiers

PMID37469721
PMCPMC10353513
OpenAlexW4382865739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.