Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37469508›Full record

ArticleACS applied nano materials2023

Scalable High Tensile Modulus Composite Laminates Using Continuous Carbon Nanotube Yarns for Aerospace Applications.

Cecil E Evers, Britannia Vondrasek, Claire N Jolowsky, Jin Gyu Park, Michael W Czabaj, Bailee E Ku, Kaylee R Thagard, Gregory M Odegard, Zhiyong Liang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied nano materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Prediction of carbon nanostructure mechanical properties and the role of defects using machine learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cecil E EversFAMU-FSU College of Engineering, High-Performance Materials Institute, Florida State University, 2005 Levy Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32311, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3226-1267
Britannia VondrasekDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9991-7446
Claire N JolowskyFAMU-FSU College of Engineering, High-Performance Materials Institute, Florida State University, 2005 Levy Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32311, United States.
Jin Gyu ParkFAMU-FSU College of Engineering, High-Performance Materials Institute, Florida State University, 2005 Levy Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32311, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9046-1905
Michael W CzabajDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.
Bailee E KuFAMU-FSU College of Engineering, High-Performance Materials Institute, Florida State University, 2005 Levy Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32311, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9550-0507
Kaylee R ThagardFAMU-FSU College of Engineering, High-Performance Materials Institute, Florida State University, 2005 Levy Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32311, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-767X
Gregory M OdegardMechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-6565
Zhiyong LiangFAMU-FSU College of Engineering, High-Performance Materials Institute, Florida State University, 2005 Levy Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32311, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5099-9957
Florida A&M University - Florida State University College of Engineering · USUniversity of Utah · USMichigan Technological University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An approach is established for fabricating high-strength and high-stiffness composite laminates with continuous carbon nanotube (CNT) yarns for scaled-up mechanical tests and potential aerospace structure applications. Continuous CNT yarns with up to 80% degree of nanotube alignment and a unique self-assembled graphitic CNT packing result in their specific tensile strengths of 1.77 ± 0.07 N/tex and an apparent specific modulus of 92.6 ± 3.2 N/tex. Unidirectional CNT yarn reinforced composite laminates with a CNT concentration of greater than 80 wt % and minimal microscale voids are fabricated using filament winding and aerospace-grade resin matrices. A specific tensile strength of up to 1.71 GPa/(g cm

Identifiers

PMID37469508
PMCPMC10353548
OpenAlexW4380881712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.