Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37469392›Full record

ArticleACS energy letters2023

Biorenewable Solvents for High-Performance Organic Solar Cells.

Julianna Panidi, Eva Mazzolini, Flurin Eisner, Yuang Fu, Francesco Furlan, Zhuoran Qiao, Martina Rimmele, Zhe Li, Xinhui Lu, Jenny Nelson and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS energy letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Solution-Processed Organic Photovoltaics: Fabrication Advances and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julianna PanidiDepartment of Chemistry & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-1857
Eva MazzoliniDepartment of Chemistry & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.
Flurin EisnerDepartment of Physics & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5507-4961
Yuang FuDepartment of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR 999077, People's Republic of China.
Francesco FurlanDepartment of Chemistry & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.
Zhuoran QiaoDepartment of Chemistry & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.
Martina RimmeleDepartment of Chemistry & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6852-5933
Zhe LiSchool of Engineering and Materials Science (SEMS), Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, U.K.
Xinhui LuDepartment of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR 999077, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-3294
Jenny NelsonDepartment of Physics & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.
James R DurrantDepartment of Chemistry & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-7345
Martin HeeneyDepartment of Chemistry & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-5020
Nicola GaspariniDepartment of Chemistry & Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London W12 0BZ, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3226-8234
Imperial College London · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HKQueen Mary University of London · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs), organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices are now achieving high enough power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) for commercialization. However, these high performances rely on active layers processed from petroleum-based and toxic solvents, which are undesirable for mass manufacturing. Here, we demonstrate the use of biorenewable 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2MeTHF) and cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) solvents to process donor: NFA-based OPVs with no additional additives in the active layer. Furthermore, to reduce the overall carbon footprint of the manufacturing cycle of the OPVs, we use polymeric donors that require a few synthetic steps for their synthesis, namely, PTQ10 and FO6-T, which are blended with the Y-series NFA Y12. High performance was achieved using 2MeTHF as the processing solvent, reaching PCEs of 14.5% and 11.4% for PTQ10:Y12 and FO6-T:Y12 blends, respectively. This work demonstrates the potential of using biorenewable solvents without additives for the processing of OPV active layers, opening the door to large-scale and green manufacturing of organic solar cells.

Identifiers

PMID37469392
PMCPMC10353010
OpenAlexW4380881950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.