Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37469179›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

A systematic task-based image quality assessment of photon-counting and energy integrating CT as a function of reconstruction kernel and phantom size.

Mridul Bhattarai, Steve Bache, Ehsan Abadi, Ehsan Samei

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mridul BhattaraiMedical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Steve BacheClinical Imaging Physics Group - Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ehsan AbadiMedical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ehsan SameiMedical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University · USDuke University Health System · USVirtual Technology (United States) · US

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
Accuracy and Precision in CT Quantification of COPD Through Virtual Imaging TrialsR01HL155293 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ABADI, EHSAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155293NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838NIH HHS P41EB028744NIH HHS R01EB001838NIH HHS R01HL155293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImage quality of photon-counting and energy integrating CT scanners changes with object size, dose to the object, and kernel selection. PURPOSE: To comprehensively compare task-generic image quality of photon-counting CT (PCCT) and energy integrating CT (EICT) systems as a function of phantom size, dose, and reconstruction kernel.

methodsA size-variant phantom (Mercury Phantom 3.0) was used to characterize the image quality of PCCT and EICT systems as a function of object size. The phantom contained five cylinders attached by slanted tapered sections. Each cylinder contained two sections: one uniform for noise, and the other with inserts for spatial resolution and contrast measurements. The phantom was scanned on Siemens' SOMATOM Force and NAEOTOM Alpha at 1.18 and 7.51 mGy without tube current modulation. CTDI

resultsFrom Br40 (soft) to Br64 (sharp), f

conclusionsBoth PCCT image types, T3D and 70-keV-VMI exhibited similar or better noise, contrast, CNR than EICT when comparing kernels with similar names. For 512 × 512 matrix, PCCT's sharp kernels had lower resolution than EICT's sharp kernels. For all image quality metrics, except extreme low, every dose condition had a similar set of IQ-matching kernels. It suggests that considering patient size and dose level to determine IQ-matching kernel pairs across PCCT and EICT systems may not be imperative while translating protocols, except when the signal to the detector is extremely low.

Indexed as

IodineTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedIodinecomputer tomographycontrastcontrast-to-noise ratiodetectability indexenergy integrating CTnoise power spectrumphoton counting CTtask transfer function

Identifiers

PMID37469179
PMCPMC10796834
OpenAlexW4384819525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.