Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37468999›Full record

ReviewSystematic reviews2023

Prognostic factors for persistent symptoms in adults with mild traumatic brain injury: an overview of systematic reviews.

Julien Déry, Béatrice Ouellet, Élaine de Guise, Ève-Line Bussières, Marie-Eve Lamontagne

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julien DérySchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, local 2475, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Béatrice OuelletSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, local 2475, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Élaine de GuiseDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Ève-Line BussièresCentre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (Cirris), 525, boul. Wilfrid-Hamel, Québec, QC, G1M 2S8, Canada.
Marie-Eve LamontagneSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, local 2475, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. marie-eve.lamontagne@fmed.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3301-7429
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is an increasing public health problem, because of its persistent symptoms and several functional consequences. Understanding the prognosis of a condition is an important component of clinical decision-making and can help to guide the prevention of persistent symptoms following mTBI. The prognosis of mTBI has stimulated several empirical primary research papers and many systematic reviews leading to the identification of a wide range of factors. We aim to synthesize these factors to get a better understanding of their breadth and scope.

methodsWe conducted an overview of systematic reviews. We searched in databases systematic reviews synthesizing evidence about the prognosis of persistent symptoms after mTBI in the adult population. Two reviewers independently screened all references and selected eligible reviews based on eligibility criteria. They extracted relevant information using an extraction grid. They also rated independently the risk of bias using the ROBIS tool. We synthesized evidence into a comprehensive conceptual map to facilitate the understanding of prognostic factors that have an impact on persistent post-concussion symptoms.

resultsFrom the 3857 references retrieved in a database search, we included 25 systematic reviews integrating the results of 312 primary articles published between 1957 and 2019. We examined 35 prognostic factors from the systematics reviews. No single prognostic factor demonstrated convincing and conclusive results. However, age, sex, and multiple concussions showed an affirmatory association with persistent post-concussion outcomes in systematic reviews.

conclusionWe highlighted the need for a comprehensive picture of prognostic factors related to persistent post-concussion symptoms. We believe that these prognostic factors would guide clinical decisions and research related to prevention and intervention regarding persistent post-concussion symptoms. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020176676.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionBrain InjuriesPost-Concussion SyndromeAdultHumansPrognosisSystematic Reviews as TopicConcussionOverviewPost-concussion symptomsPrognosisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37468999
PMCPMC10357711
OpenAlexW4384820628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.